Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: add virtual-cpufreq driver

[Viresh Kumar]

On 03-08-23, 09:50, David Dai wrote:
> > Why do you want to use this and not module_init() ? Then you can
> > simply use `module_platform_driver()`.
> 
> We found that using postcore_init over module_init results in a
> small(2-3%) but measurable benefit during boot time for VMs, so this
> is an optimization that I’d prefer to keep.

Okay. That's what platforms normally do (kick in cpufreq support
earlier), so we can boot at a higher frequency. Just wasn't sure if it
matters for this driver too.

-- 
viresh