Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] i2c: designware: Fix spelling and other issues in the comments

[Andi Shyti]

Hi Andy,

[...]

> @@ -210,12 +210,12 @@ static void psp_release_i2c_bus(void)
>  {
>  	mutex_lock(&psp_i2c_access_mutex);
>  
> -	/* Return early if mailbox was malfunctional */
> +	/* Return early if mailbox was malfunctioned */

I think "was malfunctioned" is not really correct... maybe "has
malfunctioned"? "is malfunctioning"?

>  	if (psp_i2c_mbox_fail)
>  		goto cleanup;

[...]

> @@ -508,7 +510,7 @@ void __i2c_dw_disable(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * Wait 10 times the signaling period of the highest I2C
> -		 * transfer supported by the driver (for 400KHz this is
> +		 * transfer supported by the driver (for 400kHz this is

what did you change here? :)

The rest looks good.

Thanks,
Andi

>  		 * 25us) as described in the DesignWare I2C databook.
>  		 */
>  		usleep_range(25, 250);