Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] selftests/nolibc: allow customize CROSS_COMPILE by architecture

[Willy Tarreau]

On Sun, Aug 06, 2023 at 02:46:03AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> Some cross compilers may not just be prefixed with ARCH, customize them
> by architecture may simplify the test a lot, especially, when iterate
> with ARCH.
> 
> After customizing this for every architecture, the minimal test argument
> will be architecture itself, no CROSS_COMPILE required to be passed.
> 
> If the prefix of installed cross compiler is not the same as the one
> customized, we can also pass CROSS_COMPILE as before or even pass
> CROSS_COMPILE_<ARCH>.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> index 452d8e424d28..45d231b9c5c2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ IMAGE_loongarch  = arch/loongarch/boot/vmlinuz.efi
>  IMAGE            = $(IMAGE_$(XARCH))
>  IMAGE_NAME       = $(notdir $(IMAGE))
>  
> +# CROSS_COMPILE: cross toolchain prefix by architecture
> +CROSS_COMPILE           ?= $(CROSS_COMPILE_$(XARCH))
> +
> +# make sure CC is prefixed with CROSS_COMPILE
> +$(call allow-override,CC,$(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc)
> +

Note that I feared that it would break my "CC=gcc-5.5.0" and so on but
fortunately it did not. However I don't understand what it tries to do
nor the problem it tries to solve (even the commit message is quite
unclear to me). I'm leaving it aside anyway but I wanted to let you
know.

Willy