Re: [PATCH 1/9] sched: Simplify get_nohz_timer_target()
From: Joel Fernandes
Date: Sun Aug 06 2023 - 17:44:02 EST
On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 9:52 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 15 ++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1097,25 +1097,22 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
>
> hk_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TIMER);
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> + guard(rcu)();
> +
> for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> for_each_cpu_and(i, sched_domain_span(sd), hk_mask) {
> if (cpu == i)
> continue;
>
> - if (!idle_cpu(i)) {
> - cpu = i;
> - goto unlock;
> - }
> + if (!idle_cpu(i))
> + return i;
> }
> }
>
> if (default_cpu == -1)
> default_cpu = housekeeping_any_cpu(HK_TYPE_TIMER);
> - cpu = default_cpu;
> -unlock:
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - return cpu;
> +
> + return default_cpu;
> }
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I haven't looked into the actual implementation of the guard stuff,
but rcu_read_lock_guarded() is less of an eyesore to me than
guard(rcu)(); TBH.
thanks,
- Joel