Re: [RFC 2/2] mm: Defer TLB flush by keeping both src and dst folios at migration

[Byungchul Park]

On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 05:32:30PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> The patch in its current form, I am afraid, is very very hard to review.
> It is way too big and is missing comments. Having CONFIG_MIGRC makes no
> sense (I guess it is intended to be a “chicken-bit”). Variable and
> function names are not informative. The memory barriers are handle
> improperly (please check again the smp_mb__after_atomic() rules).

I checked it. I found what I was wrong at. Thank you for pointing it out.
I will fix it from the next spin.

	Byungchul