Re: [PATCH 8/9] i2c: imx-lpi2c: Use dev_err_probe in probe function

[Andi Shyti]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 10:13:30AM +0800, Liao, Chang wrote:
> Hi, Andi
> 
> 在 2023/8/5 6:16, Andi Shyti 写道:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 05:57:36PM +0800, Liao Chang wrote:
> >> Use the dev_err_probe function instead of dev_err in the probe function
> >> so that the printed messge includes the return value and also handles
> >> -EPROBE_DEFER nicely.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 12 ++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> >> index c3287c887c6f..bfa788b3775b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> >> @@ -569,10 +569,8 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>  		sizeof(lpi2c_imx->adapter.name));
> >>  
> >>  	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(&pdev->dev, &lpi2c_imx->clks);
> >> -	if (ret < 0) {
> >> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't get I2C peripheral clock, ret=%d\n", ret);
> >> -		return ret;
> >> -	}
> >> +	if (ret < 0)
> >> +		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't get I2C peripheral clock\n");
> > 
> > you cut on this because the line was going over 100 characters? :)
> > 
> > In theory you shouldn't change the print message when doing such
> > changes and you can still split it as:
> > 
> > 		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret,
> > 				     "can't get I2C peripheral clock, ret=%d\n",
> > 				     ret);
> > 
> > and you're even within the 80 characters.
> 
> Since dev_err_probe always print the second parameter that happens to be the return value,
> I remove the "ret=%d" from the original message to avoid a redundant error message.
> 
> So is it better to keep the original message unchanged, even though dev_err_probe also prints
> the return error value? Or is it better to make this change so that all error messages printed
> in the probe function include the return value in a consistent style?

yes, you are right! Then please ignore this comment, but...

> >   	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, lpi2c_imx_isr, 0,
> >   		pdev->name, lpi2c_imx);
> > - 	if (ret) {
> > - 		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq);
> > - 		return ret;
> > - 	}
> > + 	if (ret)
> > + 		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "can't claim irq %d\n", irq);

please make it coherent to this second part, as well, where the
error number is printed.

Thank you,
Andi