Re: [PATCH net-next] Add bnxt_netlink to facilitate representor pair configurations.

From: Simon Horman
Date: Mon Aug 07 2023 - 09:49:05 EST


On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 02:29:54PM -0700, Matthew Cover wrote:

...

Hi Matthew,

> +static int bnxt_parse_attrs(struct nlattr **a, struct bnxt **bp,
> + struct net_device **dev)
> +{
> + pid_t pid;
> + struct net *ns = NULL;
> + const char *drivername;
> +
> + if (!a[BNXT_ATTR_PID]) {
> + netdev_err(*dev, "No process ID specified\n");
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> + pid = nla_get_u32(a[BNXT_ATTR_PID]);
> + ns = get_net_ns_by_pid(pid);
> + if (IS_ERR(ns)) {
> + netdev_err(*dev, "Invalid net namespace for pid %d (err: %ld)\n",
> + pid, PTR_ERR(ns));
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> +
> + if (!a[BNXT_ATTR_IF_INDEX]) {
> + netdev_err(*dev, "No interface index specified\n");
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> + *dev = dev_get_by_index(ns, nla_get_u32(a[BNXT_ATTR_IF_INDEX]));
> +
> + put_net(ns);
> + ns = NULL;
> + if (!*dev) {
> + netdev_err(*dev, "Invalid network interface index %d (err: %ld)\n",
> + nla_get_u32(a[BNXT_ATTR_IF_INDEX]), PTR_ERR(ns));
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> + if (!(*dev)->dev.parent || !(*dev)->dev.parent->driver ||
> + !(*dev)->dev.parent->driver->name) {
> + netdev_err(*dev, "Unable to get driver name for device %s\n",
> + (*dev)->name);
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> + drivername = (*dev)->dev.parent->driver->name;
> + if (strcmp(drivername, DRV_MODULE_NAME)) {
> + netdev_err(*dev, "Device %s (%s) is not a %s device!\n",
> + (*dev)->name, drivername, DRV_MODULE_NAME);
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> + *bp = netdev_priv(*dev);
> + if (!*bp) {

We only get here if *bp is NULL.
But on the following line *bp is dereferenced.

Perhaps this should be netdev_warn(*dev, ...)

Flagged by Smatch.

> + netdev_warn((*bp)->dev, "No private data\n");
> + goto err_inval;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_inval:
> + if (ns && !IS_ERR(ns))
> + put_net(ns);
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +/* handler */
> +static int bnxt_netlink_hwrm(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> +{
> + struct nlattr **a = info->attrs;
> + struct net_device *dev = NULL;
> + struct sk_buff *reply = NULL;
> + struct input *req, *nl_req;
> + struct bnxt *bp = NULL;
> + struct output *resp;
> + int len, rc;
> + void *hdr;
> +
> + rc = bnxt_parse_attrs(a, &bp, &dev);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_rc;
> +
> + if (!bp) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (!bp->hwrm_dma_pool) {
> + netdev_warn(bp->dev, "HWRM interface not currently available on %s\n",
> + dev->name);
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (!a[BNXT_ATTR_REQUEST]) {
> + netdev_warn(bp->dev, "No request specified\n");
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_rc;
> + }
> + len = nla_len(a[BNXT_ATTR_REQUEST]);
> + nl_req = nla_data(a[BNXT_ATTR_REQUEST]);
> +
> + reply = genlmsg_new(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!reply) {
> + netdev_warn(bp->dev, "Error: genlmsg_new failed\n");
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_rc;
> + }
> +
> + rc = hwrm_req_init(bp, req, nl_req->req_type);

hwrm_req_init() expects a variable of type u16 as it's type parameter.
But the tupe of nl_req->req_type is __le32.

As flagged by Sparse.


> + if (rc)
> + goto err_rc;
> +
> + rc = hwrm_req_replace(bp, req, nl_req, len);
> + if (rc)
> + goto err_rc;
> +
> + resp = hwrm_req_hold(bp, req);
> + rc = hwrm_req_send_silent(bp, req);
> + if (rc) {
> + /*
> + * Indicate success for the hwrm transport, while letting
> + * the hwrm error be passed back to the netlink caller in
> + * the response message. Caller is responsible for handling
> + * any errors.
> + *
> + * no kernel warnings are logged in this case.
> + */
> + rc = 0;
> + }
> + hdr = genlmsg_put_reply(reply, info, &bnxt_netlink_family, 0,
> + BNXT_CMD_HWRM);
> + if (nla_put(reply, BNXT_ATTR_RESPONSE, resp->resp_len, resp)) {

Likewise, the type of resp->resp_len is __le16, but an int is expected.

> + netdev_warn(bp->dev, "No space for response attribte\n");
> + hwrm_req_drop(bp, req);
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_rc;
> + }
> + genlmsg_end(reply, hdr);
> + hwrm_req_drop(bp, req);
> +
> + dev_put(dev);
> + dev = NULL;
> +
> + return genlmsg_reply(reply, info);
> +
> +err_rc:
> + if (reply && !IS_ERR(reply))
> + kfree_skb(reply);
> + if (dev && !IS_ERR(dev))
> + dev_put(dev);
> +
> + if (bp)
> + netdev_warn(bp->dev, "returning with error code %d\n", rc);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}

...