Re: [PATCH 2/5] [RESEND] x86: avoid unneeded __div64_32 function definition

[Borislav Petkov]

On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 09:37:00PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>  Otherwise you risk `__div64_32(n, base)' getting expanded to `(n, base)', 

You mean in the very obscure case of a 32-bit kernel where they don't call
do_div() but call this low level function?

I'd say if they can't be bothered to even grep the tree for the right usage,
they deserve both pieces... :)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette