Re: [PATCH v5] tools/nolibc: fix up size inflate regression
From: Zhangjin Wu
Date: Wed Aug 09 2023 - 18:18:08 EST
Hi, Willy
> Hi Zhangjin,
>
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2023 at 04:04:05AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote:
> > As reported and suggested by Willy, the inline __sysret() helper
> > introduces three types of conversions and increases the size:
> >
> > (1) the "unsigned long" argument to __sysret() forces a sign extension
> > from all sys_* functions that used to return 'int'
> >
> > (2) the comparison with the error range now has to be performed on a
> > 'unsigned long' instead of an 'int'
> >
> > (3) the return value from __sysret() is a 'long' (note, a signed long)
> > which then has to be turned back to an 'int' before being returned by the
> > caller to satisfy the caller's prototype.
> >
> > To fix up this, firstly, let's use macro instead of inline function to
> > preserves the input type and avoids these useless conversions (1), (3).
> >
> > Secondly, comparison to -MAX_ERRNO inflicts on all integer returns where
> > we could previously keep a simple sign comparison, let's use a new
> > __is_pointer() macro suggested by David Laight to limit the comparison
> > to -MAX_ERRNO (2) only for pointer returns and preserve a simple sign
> > comparison for integer returns as before. The __builtin_choose_expr()
> > is suggested by David Laight to choose different comparisons based on
> > the types to share code.
> >
> > Thirdly, fix up the following warning by an explicit conversion and let
> > __sysret() be able to accept the (void *) type of argument:
> >
> > sysroot/powerpc/include/sys.h: In function 'sbrk':
> > sysroot/powerpc/include/sys.h:104:16: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
> > 104 | return (void *)__sysret(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > Fourthly, to further workaround the argument type with 'const' flag,
> > must use __auto_type for gcc >= 11.0 and __typeof__((arg) + 0) suggested
> > by David Laight for old gcc versions.
> (...)
> > tools/include/nolibc/sys.h | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> Quite frankly, even if it can be looked at as a piece of art, I don't
> like it. It's overkill for what we need and it brings in several tricky
> macros that we don't need and that require a link to their analysis so
> that nobody breaks them by accident. I mean, if one day we need them,
> okay we know we can find them, they're perfect for certain use cases.
> But all this just to avoid a ternary operation is far too much IMHO.
> That's without counting on the compiler tricks to use the ugly
> __auto_type when available, and the macro names which continue to
> possibly interact with user code.
>
Agree, I don't like __auto_type too, although I have tried to find whether
there is a direct macro for it, but NO such one, and the __auto_type in some
older versions don't accept 'const' flag, so, I'm also worried about if gcc
will change it in the future ;-(
Seems __sysret() is mainly used by us in sys.h, perhaps we can simply
assume and guarantee nobody will use 'const' in such cases.
> And if you remember, originally you proposed to factor the SET_ERRNO()
> stuff in every syscall in order to "simplify the code and improve
> maintainability". It's clear that we've long abandonned that goal here.
> If we had no other choice, I'd rather roll back to the clean, readable
> and trustable SET_ERRNO() in every syscall!
>
Agree, or we simply use the original version without pointer returns support
(only sbrk and mmap currently) but convert it to the macro version.
Or, as the idea mentioned by Thomas in a reply: if we can let the sys_
functions use 'long' returns, or even further, we convert all of the sys_
functions to macros and let them preserve input types from library routines and
preserve return types from the my_syscall<N> macros.
As we discussed in my our syscall.h proposal, if there is a common
my_syscall(), every sys_ function can be simply defined to something
like:
#define sys_<NAME>(...) my_syscall(<NAME>, __VA_ARGS__)
In my_syscall(), it can even simply return -ENOSYS if the __NR_xxx is
not defined (we init such __NR_xxx to something like __NR_NOSYS):
// sysnr.h
// If worried about the applications use this macro, perhaps we can
// use a different prefix, for example, NOLIBC_NR_xxx
#define NOLIBC_NR_NOSYS (-1L)
#ifndef __NR_xxx
#define NOLIBC_NR_xxx NOLIBC_NR_NOSYS
#else
#define NOLIBC_NR_xxx __NR_xxx
#endif
// syscall.h
// _my_syscall is similar to syscall() in unistd.h, but without the
// __sysret normalization
#define _my_syscalln(N, ...) my_syscall##N(__VA_ARGS__)
#define _my_syscall_n(N, ...) _my_syscalln(N, __VA_ARGS__)
#define _my_syscall(...) _my_syscall_n(_syscall_narg(__VA_ARGS__), ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define my_syscall(name, ...) \
({ \
long _ret; \
if (NOLIBC_NR_##name == NOLIBC_NR_NOSYS) \
_ret = -ENOSYS; \
else \
_ret = _my_syscall(NOLIBC_NR_##name, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
_ret; \
})
// sys_<NAME> list, based on unistd.h
#define sys_<NAME>(...) my_syscall(<NAME>, __VA_ARGS__)
#define sys_<NAME>(...) my_syscall(<NAME>, __VA_ARGS__)
#define sys_<NAME>(...) my_syscall(<NAME>, __VA_ARGS__)
With above conversions, we may be able to predefine all of the
sys_<NAME> functions to preserve the input types from library rountines
and return types from my_syscall<N> (by default, 'long'). This also
follows the suggestion from Arnd: let sys_ not use the other low level
syscalls, only use its own.
This may also help us to remove all of the `#ifdef __NR_` wrappers, we
can directly check the -ENOSYS in the library routines and try another
sys_<NAME> if required, at last, call __sysret() to normalize the errors
and return value.
Use dup2 and dup3 as examples, with sysnr.h and syscall.h above, sys.h
will work like this, without any #ifdef's:
/*
* int dup2(int old, int new);
*/
static __attribute__((unused))
int dup2(int old, int new)
{
int ret = sys_dup3(old, new, 0);
if (ret == -ENOSYS)
ret = sys_dup2(old, new);
return __sysret(ret);
}
/*
* int dup3(int old, int new, int flags);
*/
static __attribute__((unused))
int dup3(int old, int new, int flags)
{
return __sysret(sys_dup3(old, new, flags));
}
If the above description is not clear enough, I have changed something for this
idea with more cleanups and have done some simple tests:
Compare with v5 --> v6 (with gcc-13.2.0):
i386: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 19509 -> 19250
x86_64: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 22012 -> 21758
arm64: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 25868 -> 25804
arm: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 23112 -> 22828
mips: 160 test(s): 157 passed, 3 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 22924 -> 22740
ppc: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 26628 -> 26376
ppc64: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 27204 -> 26756
ppc64le: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 27828 -> 27364
riscv: 160 test(s): 158 passed, 2 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 21870 -> 21772
s390: 160 test(s): 157 passed, 3 skipped, 0 failed => status: warning 22192 -> 21992
And now we get:
$ wc -l tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
746 tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
$ wc -l tools/include/nolibc/sysnr.h
410 tools/include/nolibc/sysnr.h
$ wc -l tools/include/nolibc/syscall.h
110 tools/include/nolibc/syscall.h
Before:
$ wc -l tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
1222 tools/include/nolibc/sys.h
Most of the library routines become one line code.
The main size reduced may be the carefully tuned sys_ selection, for example,
linkat v.s. link, the patchset still require some cleanups, will send v6 for
more discussion if you agree.
> So I just restarted from what I proposed the other day, using a ternary
> operator as I suggested in order to address the const case, and it gives
> me the following patch, which is way simpler and still a bit readable.
> It's made of two nested (?:) :
> - the first one to determine if we have to check for the sign or
> against -MAX_ERRNO to detect an error (depends on the arg's
> signedness)
> - the second one to return either the argument as-is or -1.
>
> The only two tricks are that (typeof(arg))-1 is compared to 1 instead of
> zero so that gcc doesn't complain that we're comparing against a null
> pointer, and similarly we compare arg+1 to 1 instead of arg to 0 for the
> negative case, and that's all. It gives me the expected code and output
> from gcc-4.7 to 12.3, and clang-13.
>
> I've checked against your version and it's always exactly the same (in
> fact to be more precise sometimes it's 1-2 bytes smaller but that's only
> due to the compiler taking liberties with the code ordering, it could as
> well have done it the other way around, though it did not this time):
>
> 26144 zhangjin-v5/nolibc-test--Os-arm64 | 26144 willy/nolibc-test--Os-arm64
> 23340 zhangjin-v5/nolibc-test--Os-armv5 | 23340 willy/nolibc-test--Os-armv5
[...]
>
> Unless there's any objection, I'll queue this one. And if __sysret()
> annoys us again in the future I might very well revert that simplification.
>
> Any question about the patch ?
>
[...]
>
> -/* Syscall return helper for library routines, set errno as -ret when ret is in
> - * range of [-MAX_ERRNO, -1]
> - *
> - * Note, No official reference states the errno range here aligns with musl
> - * (src/internal/syscall_ret.c) and glibc (sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sysdep.h)
> +/* Syscall return helper: takes the syscall value in argument and checks for an
> + * error in it. For unsigned returns, an error is within [-MAX_ERRNO, -1]. For
> + * signed returns, an error is any value < 0. When an error is encountered,
> + * -ret is set into errno and -1 is returned. Otherwise the returned value is
> + * passed as-is with its type preserved.
> */
>
> -static __inline__ __attribute__((unused, always_inline))
> -long __sysret(unsigned long ret)
> -{
> - if (ret >= (unsigned long)-MAX_ERRNO) {
> - SET_ERRNO(-(long)ret);
> - return -1;
> - }
> - return ret;
> -}
> +#define __sysret(arg) \
> +({ \
> + __typeof__(arg) __sysret_arg = (arg); \
Here ignores the 'const' flag in input type?
> + ((((__typeof__(arg)) -1) > (__typeof__(arg)) 1) ? /* unsigned arg? */ \
> + (uintptr_t)__sysret_arg >= (uintptr_t)-(MAX_ERRNO) : /* errors */ \
> + (__sysret_arg + 1) < ((__typeof__(arg))1) /* signed: <0 = error */ \
> + ) ? ({ \
> + SET_ERRNO(-(intptr_t)__sysret_arg); \
> + ((__typeof__(arg)) -1); /* return -1 upon error */ \
> + }) : __sysret_arg; /* return original value & type on success */ \
> +})
> +
>
To be honest, it is also a little complex when with one "?:" embedded in
another, I even don't understand how the 'unsigned arg' branch works,
sorry, is it dark magic like the __is_constexpr? ;-)
Thanks,
Zhangjin
> /* Functions in this file only describe syscalls. They're declared static so
> * that the compiler usually decides to inline them while still being allowed
> @@ -94,7 +97,7 @@ void *sbrk(intptr_t inc)
> if (ret && sys_brk(ret + inc) == ret + inc)
> return ret + inc;
>
> - return (void *)__sysret(-ENOMEM);
> + return __sysret((void *)-ENOMEM);
> }
>
>
> @@ -682,7 +685,7 @@ void *sys_mmap(void *addr, size_t length, int prot, int flags, int fd,
> static __attribute__((unused))
> void *mmap(void *addr, size_t length, int prot, int flags, int fd, off_t offset)
> {
> - return (void *)__sysret((unsigned long)sys_mmap(addr, length, prot, flags, fd, offset));
> + return __sysret(sys_mmap(addr, length, prot, flags, fd, offset));
> }
>
> static __attribute__((unused))
> --
> 2.35.3