Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] dt-bindings: atmel-nand: add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc

From: Varshini.Rajendran
Date: Thu Aug 10 2023 - 01:27:56 EST


On 28/07/23 4:36 pm, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
>>
>
> Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?

Hi Tudor,

The motivation is to have compatibles specific to the SoC. I am aware
that there is no change in the IP nor the driver. As Krzysztof mentioned
in another patch, this is just to add a SoC specific compatible string.
Hope this clears the query.

>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
>> index 50645828ac20..4598930851d9 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
>> "atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
>> "atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
>> "microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
>> + "microchip,sam9x7-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
>> - reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
>> block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
>>

--
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.