[tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy

From: tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Aug 10 2023 - 03:11:16 EST

The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID: 147f3efaa24182a21706bca15eab2f3f4630b5fe
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/147f3efaa24182a21706bca15eab2f3f4630b5fe
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed, 31 May 2023 13:58:44 +02:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 09:43:58 +02:00

sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy

Where CFS is currently a WFQ based scheduler with only a single knob,
the weight. The addition of a second, latency oriented parameter,
makes something like WF2Q or EEVDF based a much better fit.

Specifically, EEVDF does EDF like scheduling in the left half of the
tree -- those entities that are owed service. Except because this is a
virtual time scheduler, the deadlines are in virtual time as well,
which is what allows over-subscription.

EEVDF has two parameters:

- weight, or time-slope: which is mapped to nice just as before

- request size, or slice length: which is used to compute
the virtual deadline as: vd_i = ve_i + r_i/w_i

Basically, by setting a smaller slice, the deadline will be earlier
and the task will be more eligible and ran earlier.

Tick driven preemption is driven by request/slice completion; while
wakeup preemption is driven by the deadline.

Because the tree is now effectively an interval tree, and the
selection is no longer 'leftmost', over-scheduling is less of a
problem.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230531124603.931005524@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
include/linux/sched.h | 4 +-
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 +-
kernel/sched/debug.c | 6 +-
kernel/sched/fair.c | 338 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
kernel/sched/features.h | 3 +-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 4 +-
6 files changed, 308 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index ba1828b..177b3f3 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -549,6 +549,9 @@ struct sched_entity {
/* For load-balancing: */
struct load_weight load;
struct rb_node run_node;
+ u64 deadline;
+ u64 min_deadline;
+
struct list_head group_node;
unsigned int on_rq;

@@ -557,6 +560,7 @@ struct sched_entity {
u64 prev_sum_exec_runtime;
u64 vruntime;
s64 vlag;
+ u64 slice;

u64 nr_migrations;

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 84b0d47..e85a2fd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4502,6 +4502,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
p->se.nr_migrations = 0;
p->se.vruntime = 0;
p->se.vlag = 0;
+ p->se.slice = sysctl_sched_min_granularity;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);

#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index e48d2b2..18efc6d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -582,9 +582,13 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
else
SEQ_printf(m, " %c", task_state_to_char(p));

- SEQ_printf(m, " %15s %5d %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld %5d ",
+ SEQ_printf(m, "%15s %5d %9Ld.%06ld %c %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld.%06ld %9Ld %5d ",
p->comm, task_pid_nr(p),
SPLIT_NS(p->se.vruntime),
+ entity_eligible(cfs_rq_of(&p->se), &p->se) ? 'E' : 'N',
+ SPLIT_NS(p->se.deadline),
+ SPLIT_NS(p->se.slice),
+ SPLIT_NS(p->se.sum_exec_runtime),
(long long)(p->nvcsw + p->nivcsw),
p->prio);

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index dd12ada..4d3505d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
#include <linux/psi.h>
#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
#include <linux/task_work.h>
+#include <linux/rbtree_augmented.h>

#include <asm/switch_to.h>

@@ -347,6 +348,16 @@ static u64 __calc_delta(u64 delta_exec, unsigned long weight, struct load_weight
return mul_u64_u32_shr(delta_exec, fact, shift);
}

+/*
+ * delta /= w
+ */
+static inline u64 calc_delta_fair(u64 delta, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ if (unlikely(se->load.weight != NICE_0_LOAD))
+ delta = __calc_delta(delta, NICE_0_LOAD, &se->load);
+
+ return delta;
+}

const struct sched_class fair_sched_class;

@@ -717,11 +728,62 @@ u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)

/*
* lag_i = S - s_i = w_i * (V - v_i)
+ *
+ * However, since V is approximated by the weighted average of all entities it
+ * is possible -- by addition/removal/reweight to the tree -- to move V around
+ * and end up with a larger lag than we started with.
+ *
+ * Limit this to either double the slice length with a minimum of TICK_NSEC
+ * since that is the timing granularity.
+ *
+ * EEVDF gives the following limit for a steady state system:
+ *
+ * -r_max < lag < max(r_max, q)
+ *
+ * XXX could add max_slice to the augmented data to track this.
*/
void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
+ s64 lag, limit;
+
SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq);
- se->vlag = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq) - se->vruntime;
+ lag = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq) - se->vruntime;
+
+ limit = calc_delta_fair(max_t(u64, 2*se->slice, TICK_NSEC), se);
+ se->vlag = clamp(lag, -limit, limit);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Entity is eligible once it received less service than it ought to have,
+ * eg. lag >= 0.
+ *
+ * lag_i = S - s_i = w_i*(V - v_i)
+ *
+ * lag_i >= 0 -> V >= v_i
+ *
+ * \Sum (v_i - v)*w_i
+ * V = ------------------ + v
+ * \Sum w_i
+ *
+ * lag_i >= 0 -> \Sum (v_i - v)*w_i >= (v_i - v)*(\Sum w_i)
+ *
+ * Note: using 'avg_vruntime() > se->vruntime' is inacurate due
+ * to the loss in precision caused by the division.
+ */
+int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
+ s64 avg = cfs_rq->avg_vruntime;
+ long load = cfs_rq->avg_load;
+
+ if (curr && curr->on_rq) {
+ unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);
+
+ avg += entity_key(cfs_rq, curr) * weight;
+ load += weight;
+ }
+
+ return avg >= entity_key(cfs_rq, se) * load;
}

static u64 __update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime)
@@ -740,8 +802,8 @@ static u64 __update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, u64 vruntime)

static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
+ struct sched_entity *se = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
- struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&cfs_rq->tasks_timeline);

u64 vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;

@@ -752,9 +814,7 @@ static void update_min_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
curr = NULL;
}

- if (leftmost) { /* non-empty tree */
- struct sched_entity *se = __node_2_se(leftmost);
-
+ if (se) {
if (!curr)
vruntime = se->vruntime;
else
@@ -771,18 +831,50 @@ static inline bool __entity_less(struct rb_node *a, const struct rb_node *b)
return entity_before(__node_2_se(a), __node_2_se(b));
}

+#define deadline_gt(field, lse, rse) ({ (s64)((lse)->field - (rse)->field) > 0; })
+
+static inline void __update_min_deadline(struct sched_entity *se, struct rb_node *node)
+{
+ if (node) {
+ struct sched_entity *rse = __node_2_se(node);
+ if (deadline_gt(min_deadline, se, rse))
+ se->min_deadline = rse->min_deadline;
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * se->min_deadline = min(se->deadline, left->min_deadline, right->min_deadline)
+ */
+static inline bool min_deadline_update(struct sched_entity *se, bool exit)
+{
+ u64 old_min_deadline = se->min_deadline;
+ struct rb_node *node = &se->run_node;
+
+ se->min_deadline = se->deadline;
+ __update_min_deadline(se, node->rb_right);
+ __update_min_deadline(se, node->rb_left);
+
+ return se->min_deadline == old_min_deadline;
+}
+
+RB_DECLARE_CALLBACKS(static, min_deadline_cb, struct sched_entity,
+ run_node, min_deadline, min_deadline_update);
+
/*
* Enqueue an entity into the rb-tree:
*/
static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
avg_vruntime_add(cfs_rq, se);
- rb_add_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline, __entity_less);
+ se->min_deadline = se->deadline;
+ rb_add_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline,
+ __entity_less, &min_deadline_cb);
}

static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
{
- rb_erase_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline);
+ rb_erase_augmented_cached(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline,
+ &min_deadline_cb);
avg_vruntime_sub(cfs_rq, se);
}

@@ -806,6 +898,97 @@ static struct sched_entity *__pick_next_entity(struct sched_entity *se)
return __node_2_se(next);
}

+static struct sched_entity *pick_cfs(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
+{
+ struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
+
+ /*
+ * If curr is set we have to see if its left of the leftmost entity
+ * still in the tree, provided there was anything in the tree at all.
+ */
+ if (!left || (curr && entity_before(curr, left)))
+ left = curr;
+
+ return left;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Earliest Eligible Virtual Deadline First
+ *
+ * In order to provide latency guarantees for different request sizes
+ * EEVDF selects the best runnable task from two criteria:
+ *
+ * 1) the task must be eligible (must be owed service)
+ *
+ * 2) from those tasks that meet 1), we select the one
+ * with the earliest virtual deadline.
+ *
+ * We can do this in O(log n) time due to an augmented RB-tree. The
+ * tree keeps the entries sorted on service, but also functions as a
+ * heap based on the deadline by keeping:
+ *
+ * se->min_deadline = min(se->deadline, se->{left,right}->min_deadline)
+ *
+ * Which allows an EDF like search on (sub)trees.
+ */
+static struct sched_entity *pick_eevdf(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
+{
+ struct rb_node *node = cfs_rq->tasks_timeline.rb_root.rb_node;
+ struct sched_entity *curr = cfs_rq->curr;
+ struct sched_entity *best = NULL;
+
+ if (curr && (!curr->on_rq || !entity_eligible(cfs_rq, curr)))
+ curr = NULL;
+
+ while (node) {
+ struct sched_entity *se = __node_2_se(node);
+
+ /*
+ * If this entity is not eligible, try the left subtree.
+ */
+ if (!entity_eligible(cfs_rq, se)) {
+ node = node->rb_left;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If this entity has an earlier deadline than the previous
+ * best, take this one. If it also has the earliest deadline
+ * of its subtree, we're done.
+ */
+ if (!best || deadline_gt(deadline, best, se)) {
+ best = se;
+ if (best->deadline == best->min_deadline)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the earlest deadline in this subtree is in the fully
+ * eligible left half of our space, go there.
+ */
+ if (node->rb_left &&
+ __node_2_se(node->rb_left)->min_deadline == se->min_deadline) {
+ node = node->rb_left;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ node = node->rb_right;
+ }
+
+ if (!best || (curr && deadline_gt(deadline, best, curr)))
+ best = curr;
+
+ if (unlikely(!best)) {
+ struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
+ if (left) {
+ pr_err("EEVDF scheduling fail, picking leftmost\n");
+ return left;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return best;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
struct sched_entity *__pick_last_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
@@ -840,17 +1023,6 @@ int sched_update_scaling(void)
#endif

/*
- * delta /= w
- */
-static inline u64 calc_delta_fair(u64 delta, struct sched_entity *se)
-{
- if (unlikely(se->load.weight != NICE_0_LOAD))
- delta = __calc_delta(delta, NICE_0_LOAD, &se->load);
-
- return delta;
-}
-
-/*
* The idea is to set a period in which each task runs once.
*
* When there are too many tasks (sched_nr_latency) we have to stretch
@@ -915,6 +1087,48 @@ static u64 sched_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
return slice;
}

+static void clear_buddies(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);
+
+/*
+ * XXX: strictly: vd_i += N*r_i/w_i such that: vd_i > ve_i
+ * this is probably good enough.
+ */
+static void update_deadline(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+ if ((s64)(se->vruntime - se->deadline) < 0)
+ return;
+
+ if (sched_feat(EEVDF)) {
+ /*
+ * For EEVDF the virtual time slope is determined by w_i (iow.
+ * nice) while the request time r_i is determined by
+ * sysctl_sched_min_granularity.
+ */
+ se->slice = sysctl_sched_min_granularity;
+
+ /*
+ * The task has consumed its request, reschedule.
+ */
+ if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1) {
+ resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
+ clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);
+ }
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * When many tasks blow up the sched_period; it is possible
+ * that sched_slice() reports unusually large results (when
+ * many tasks are very light for example). Therefore impose a
+ * maximum.
+ */
+ se->slice = min_t(u64, sched_slice(cfs_rq, se), sysctl_sched_latency);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * EEVDF: vd_i = ve_i + r_i / w_i
+ */
+ se->deadline = se->vruntime + calc_delta_fair(se->slice, se);
+}
+
#include "pelt.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP

@@ -1047,6 +1261,7 @@ static void update_curr(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
schedstat_add(cfs_rq->exec_clock, delta_exec);

curr->vruntime += calc_delta_fair(delta_exec, curr);
+ update_deadline(cfs_rq, curr);
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);

if (entity_is_task(curr)) {
@@ -3521,6 +3736,14 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
* we need to scale se->vlag when w_i changes.
*/
se->vlag = div_s64(se->vlag * old_weight, weight);
+ } else {
+ s64 deadline = se->deadline - se->vruntime;
+ /*
+ * When the weight changes, the virtual time slope changes and
+ * we should adjust the relative virtual deadline accordingly.
+ */
+ deadline = div_s64(deadline * old_weight, weight);
+ se->deadline = se->vruntime + deadline;
}

#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -4871,6 +5094,7 @@ static inline bool entity_is_long_sleeper(struct sched_entity *se)
static void
place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
{
+ u64 vslice = calc_delta_fair(se->slice, se);
u64 vruntime = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq);
s64 lag = 0;

@@ -4942,9 +5166,9 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
*/
load = cfs_rq->avg_load;
if (curr && curr->on_rq)
- load += curr->load.weight;
+ load += scale_load_down(curr->load.weight);

- lag *= load + se->load.weight;
+ lag *= load + scale_load_down(se->load.weight);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!load))
load = 1;
lag = div_s64(lag, load);
@@ -4985,6 +5209,19 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int initial)
}

se->vruntime = vruntime;
+
+ /*
+ * When joining the competition; the exisiting tasks will be,
+ * on average, halfway through their slice, as such start tasks
+ * off with half a slice to ease into the competition.
+ */
+ if (sched_feat(PLACE_DEADLINE_INITIAL) && initial)
+ vslice /= 2;
+
+ /*
+ * EEVDF: vd_i = ve_i + r_i/w_i
+ */
+ se->deadline = se->vruntime + vslice;
}

static void check_enqueue_throttle(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
@@ -5207,19 +5444,12 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
static void
check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
{
- unsigned long ideal_runtime, delta_exec;
+ unsigned long delta_exec;
struct sched_entity *se;
s64 delta;

- /*
- * When many tasks blow up the sched_period; it is possible that
- * sched_slice() reports unusually large results (when many tasks are
- * very light for example). Therefore impose a maximum.
- */
- ideal_runtime = min_t(u64, sched_slice(cfs_rq, curr), sysctl_sched_latency);
-
delta_exec = curr->sum_exec_runtime - curr->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
- if (delta_exec > ideal_runtime) {
+ if (delta_exec > curr->slice) {
resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
/*
* The current task ran long enough, ensure it doesn't get
@@ -5243,7 +5473,7 @@ check_preempt_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
if (delta < 0)
return;

- if (delta > ideal_runtime)
+ if (delta > curr->slice)
resched_curr(rq_of(cfs_rq));
}

@@ -5298,17 +5528,20 @@ wakeup_preempt_entity(struct sched_entity *curr, struct sched_entity *se);
static struct sched_entity *
pick_next_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr)
{
- struct sched_entity *left = __pick_first_entity(cfs_rq);
- struct sched_entity *se;
+ struct sched_entity *left, *se;

- /*
- * If curr is set we have to see if its left of the leftmost entity
- * still in the tree, provided there was anything in the tree at all.
- */
- if (!left || (curr && entity_before(curr, left)))
- left = curr;
+ if (sched_feat(EEVDF)) {
+ /*
+ * Enabling NEXT_BUDDY will affect latency but not fairness.
+ */
+ if (sched_feat(NEXT_BUDDY) &&
+ cfs_rq->next && entity_eligible(cfs_rq, cfs_rq->next))
+ return cfs_rq->next;
+
+ return pick_eevdf(cfs_rq);
+ }

- se = left; /* ideally we run the leftmost entity */
+ se = left = pick_cfs(cfs_rq, curr);

/*
* Avoid running the skip buddy, if running something else can
@@ -5401,7 +5634,7 @@ entity_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *curr, int queued)
return;
#endif

- if (cfs_rq->nr_running > 1)
+ if (!sched_feat(EEVDF) && cfs_rq->nr_running > 1)
check_preempt_tick(cfs_rq, curr);
}

@@ -6445,13 +6678,12 @@ static inline void unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs(struct rq *rq) {}
static void hrtick_start_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
- struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);

SCHED_WARN_ON(task_rq(p) != rq);

if (rq->cfs.h_nr_running > 1) {
- u64 slice = sched_slice(cfs_rq, se);
u64 ran = se->sum_exec_runtime - se->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
+ u64 slice = se->slice;
s64 delta = slice - ran;

if (delta < 0) {
@@ -8228,7 +8460,19 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_
if (cse_is_idle != pse_is_idle)
return;

- update_curr(cfs_rq_of(se));
+ cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
+ update_curr(cfs_rq);
+
+ if (sched_feat(EEVDF)) {
+ /*
+ * XXX pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) != se ?
+ */
+ if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse)
+ goto preempt;
+
+ return;
+ }
+
if (wakeup_preempt_entity(se, pse) == 1) {
/*
* Bias pick_next to pick the sched entity that is
@@ -8474,7 +8718,7 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)

clear_buddies(cfs_rq, se);

- if (curr->policy != SCHED_BATCH) {
+ if (sched_feat(EEVDF) || curr->policy != SCHED_BATCH) {
update_rq_clock(rq);
/*
* Update run-time statistics of the 'current'.
@@ -8487,6 +8731,8 @@ static void yield_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
*/
rq_clock_skip_update(rq);
}
+ if (sched_feat(EEVDF))
+ se->deadline += calc_delta_fair(se->slice, se);

set_skip_buddy(se);
}
@@ -12363,8 +12609,8 @@ static void rq_offline_fair(struct rq *rq)
static inline bool
__entity_slice_used(struct sched_entity *se, int min_nr_tasks)
{
- u64 slice = sched_slice(cfs_rq_of(se), se);
u64 rtime = se->sum_exec_runtime - se->prev_sum_exec_runtime;
+ u64 slice = se->slice;

return (rtime * min_nr_tasks > slice);
}
@@ -13059,7 +13305,7 @@ static unsigned int get_rr_interval_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task
* idle runqueue:
*/
if (rq->cfs.load.weight)
- rr_interval = NS_TO_JIFFIES(sched_slice(cfs_rq_of(se), se));
+ rr_interval = NS_TO_JIFFIES(se->slice);

return rr_interval;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
index 7958a10..60cce1e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/features.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, true)
* sleep+wake cycles. EEVDF placement strategy #1, #2 if disabled.
*/
SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_LAG, true)
+SCHED_FEAT(PLACE_DEADLINE_INITIAL, true)

/*
* Prefer to schedule the task we woke last (assuming it failed
@@ -103,3 +104,5 @@ SCHED_FEAT(LATENCY_WARN, false)

SCHED_FEAT(ALT_PERIOD, true)
SCHED_FEAT(BASE_SLICE, true)
+
+SCHED_FEAT(EEVDF, true)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 52a0a4b..aa5b293 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2505,9 +2505,10 @@ extern void check_preempt_curr(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags);
extern const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_migrate;
extern const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_migration_cost;

+extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_min_granularity;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_latency;
-extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_min_granularity;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_idle_min_granularity;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity;
extern int sysctl_resched_latency_warn_ms;
@@ -3487,5 +3488,6 @@ static inline void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t) { }
#endif

extern u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
+extern int entity_eligible(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se);

#endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */