On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:48:17AM +0200, Josua Mayer wrote:Would it be okay changing 100000baseSR4 to 100000baseSR dropping the "4"?
Handle extended compliance code 0x1 (SFF8024_ECC_100G_25GAUI_C2M_AOC)Thanks. I think I would like one extra change:
for active optical cables supporting 25G and 100G speeds.
+ case SFF8024_ECC_100G_25GAUI_C2M_AOC:Since SFPs are single lane, SR4 doesn't make sense (which requires
case SFF8024_ECC_100GBASE_SR4_25GBASE_SR:
phylink_set(modes, 100000baseSR4_Full);
four lanes), and I shouldn't have added it when adding these modes.
It would be a good idea to drop that, or at least for the
addition of the SFF8024_ECC_100G_25GAUI_C2M_AOC case.