RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] net: phylink: add a function to resume phy alone to fix resume issue with WoL enabled
From: Clark Wang
Date: Thu Aug 10 2023 - 23:39:24 EST
Hi Alexis,
I am so sorry. Clement happened to be busy at the end of March, and I was busy with other projects later, so this issue was shelved.
If you have now taken over the job. I can work with you to solve this problem.
The information he gave me at that time was saying "My need is for the PCS to be configured before the stmmac_hw_setup() is phylink_major_config().". So the reason why his patch put phylink_start() before stmmac_hw_setup() is to ensure to execute the phylink_mac_initial_config() function in phylink_start() before MAC reset, right?
But his patch only changed stmmac_open(), that is, it only affected the sequence after the first startup.
Have you tested the system suspend/resume?
In the resume process, phylink_major_config() is called in phylink_resolve(). It is a work. In some cases on some of our platforms, this work may not be executed in time, which will lead to the lack of RXC, which will cause the MAC reset to fail.
Best Regards,
Clark Wang
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2023年8月11日 0:29
> To: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@xxxxxxx>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>; peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx;
> alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx;
> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxx; hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx;
> netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>; Thomas Petazzoni
> <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] net: phylink: add a function to resume phy alone to
> fix resume issue with WoL enabled
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 06:10:04PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> > Hello Clark, Russell,
> >
> > On 2/23/23 12:06, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:27:06AM +0000, Clark Wang wrote:
> > >> Hi Russel,
> > >>
> > >> I have sent the V4 patch set yesterday.
> > >> You can check it from:
> https://lore.ker/
> nel.org%2Flinux-arm-kernel%2F20230222092636.1984847-2-xiaoning.wang%4
> 0nxp.com%2FT%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cxiaoning.wang%40nxp.com%7Ccc3388
> b42e244474ceb608db99bedff0%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0
> %7C0%7C638272817295048537%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4
> wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7
> C%7C%7C&sdata=k3kDU5bfPF6eVBjhEAKbUmbO%2FU%2BwwBCMRVW0%2B
> w5a0D0%3D&reserved=0
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ah yes, sent while net-next is closed.
> > >
> > > Have you had any contact with Clément Léger ? If not, please can you
> > > reach out to Clément, because he has virtually the same problem. I
> > > don't want to end up with a load of different fixes in the mainline
> > > kernel for the same "we need the PHY clock enabled on stmmac" problem
> > > from different people.
> >
> > I am resuming Clement's initial efforts on RZN1 GMAC interface, which
> indeed is
> > in need of an early PCS initialization mechanism too ([1]).
> >
> > > Please try to come up with one patch set between you both to fix this.
> > >
> > > (effectively, that's a temporary NAK on your series.)>
> >
> > I would like to know if this series is still ongoing/alive ? I have checked for
> > follow-ups after V4 sent by Clark ([2]), but did not find anything. Clement
> > handed me over the topic right when Russell suggested to discuss this shared
> > need, so I am not sure if any mutualization discussion has happened yet ?
> >
> > If not, what would be the next steps ? Based on my understanding and
> comments on
> > the [2] v3, I feel that Clark's series would be a good starting point. In order
> > to be able to use it in both series, we could possibly make it less specific to
> > the "resume" mechanism (basically, phylink_phy_resume() =>
> > phylink_phy_early_start() ) ? It would then prevent [1] from moving the whole
> > phylink_start() in stmmac_main too early (see issue raised by Russell) and
> allow
> > to just call phylink_phy_early_start() early enough, while still being usable in
> > the resume scenario raised by Clark. Or am I missing bigger issues with
> current
> > series ?
>
> The whole thing died a death as soon as I suggested that the two parties
> work together, so currently as far as I'm concerned, the issue is dead
> and no patches have been merged to fix it.
>
> As I stated, I don't want to merge one solution, and then have the other
> solution then come along later... the simple answer would have been for
> party A to test party B's changes to see whether they solved the
> problem, but clearly that never happened.
>
> If there's an unwillingness to work together to solve a common problem,
> then the problem will remain unsolved.
>
> Note that we also have an ongoing discussion because of the AR803x PHYs
> and their default-enabled hibernation mode, for which I've proposed
> this patch. I haven't considered whether it should impact the resume
> problem - it probably _should_ and it should probably cause the PHY to
> resume outputting its clock when it resumes (which should have already
> happened by the time stmmac begins resuming.)
>
> However, as no one seems prepared to constructively comment on either
> my proposal nor (so far) the patch, there's no guarantee that we'll
> merge the change below.
>
> So, right now I've no idea what's going to become of stmmac and its
> requirement to have RXC always present. It seems there's multiple
> issues that that requirement causes.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index fcab363d8dfa..a954f1d61709 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,11 @@ static int stmmac_phy_setup(struct stmmac_priv
> *priv)
> ~(MAC_10HD | MAC_100HD | MAC_1000HD);
> priv->phylink_config.mac_managed_pm = true;
>
> + /* stmmac always requires a receive clock in order for things like
> + * hardware reset to work.
> + */
> + priv->phylink_config.mac_requires_rxc = true;
> +
> phylink = phylink_create(&priv->phylink_config, fwnode,
> mode, &stmmac_phylink_mac_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(phylink))
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> index 13c4121fa309..619a63a0d14f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> @@ -990,7 +990,8 @@ static int at803x_hibernation_mode_config(struct
> phy_device *phydev)
> /* The default after hardware reset is hibernation mode enabled. After
> * software reset, the value is retained.
> */
> - if (!(priv->flags & AT803X_DISABLE_HIBERNATION_MODE))
> + if (!(priv->flags & AT803X_DISABLE_HIBERNATION_MODE) &&
> + !(phydev->dev_flags & PHY_F_RXC_ALWAYS_ON))
> return 0;
>
> return at803x_debug_reg_mask(phydev,
> AT803X_DEBUG_REG_HIB_CTRL,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> index 4f1c8bb199e9..6568a2759101 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> @@ -1830,6 +1830,8 @@ static int phylink_bringup_phy(struct phylink *pl,
> struct phy_device *phy,
> static int phylink_attach_phy(struct phylink *pl, struct phy_device *phy,
> phy_interface_t interface)
> {
> + u32 flags = 0;
> +
> if (WARN_ON(pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_FIXED ||
> (pl->cfg_link_an_mode == MLO_AN_INBAND &&
> phy_interface_mode_is_8023z(interface) && !pl->sfp_bus)))
> @@ -1838,7 +1840,10 @@ static int phylink_attach_phy(struct phylink *pl,
> struct phy_device *phy,
> if (pl->phydev)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, 0, interface);
> + if (pl->config.mac_requires_rxc)
> + flags |= PHY_F_RXC_ALWAYS_ON;
> +
> + return phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy, flags, interface);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1941,6 +1946,9 @@ int phylink_fwnode_phy_connect(struct phylink *pl,
> pl->link_config.interface = pl->link_interface;
> }
>
> + if (pl->config.mac_requires_rxc)
> + flags |= PHY_F_RXC_ALWAYS_ON;
> +
> ret = phy_attach_direct(pl->netdev, phy_dev, flags,
> pl->link_interface);
> phy_device_free(phy_dev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
> index ba08b0e60279..79df5e01707d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/phy.h
> +++ b/include/linux/phy.h
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ struct phy_device {
>
> /* Generic phy_device::dev_flags */
> #define PHY_F_NO_IRQ 0x80000000
> +#define PHY_F_RXC_ALWAYS_ON BIT(30)
>
> static inline struct phy_device *to_phy_device(const struct device *dev)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/phylink.h b/include/linux/phylink.h
> index 789c516c6b4a..a83c1a77338f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/phylink.h
> +++ b/include/linux/phylink.h
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ enum phylink_op_type {
> * @poll_fixed_state: if true, starts link_poll,
> * if MAC link is at %MLO_AN_FIXED mode.
> * @mac_managed_pm: if true, indicate the MAC driver is responsible for
> PHY PM.
> + * @mac_requires_rxc: if true, the MAC always requires a receive clock from
> PHY.
> * @ovr_an_inband: if true, override PCS to MLO_AN_INBAND
> * @get_fixed_state: callback to execute to determine the fixed link state,
> * if MAC link is at %MLO_AN_FIXED mode.
> @@ -216,6 +217,7 @@ struct phylink_config {
> enum phylink_op_type type;
> bool poll_fixed_state;
> bool mac_managed_pm;
> + bool mac_requires_rxc;
> bool ovr_an_inband;
> void (*get_fixed_state)(struct phylink_config *config,
> struct phylink_link_state *state);
>
> --
> RMK's Patch system:
> https://www.ar/
> mlinux.org.uk%2Fdeveloper%2Fpatches%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cxiaoning.wan
> g%40nxp.com%7Ccc3388b42e244474ceb608db99bedff0%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6
> fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C638272817295048537%7CUnknown%7CT
> WFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ
> XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FLZFtiTfr1ZM%2B7OZ%2FM7I
> JkZH42DVgcNMZx8VohBSv38%3D&reserved=0
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!