RE: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

[Pandey, Radhey Shyam]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2023 9:47 PM
> To: Pandey, Radhey Shyam <radhey.shyam.pandey@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: andersson@xxxxxxxxxx; mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx;
> krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; Simek, Michal
> <michal.simek@xxxxxxx>; Levinsky, Ben <ben.levinsky@xxxxxxx>; Shah,
> Tanmay <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxx>; linux-remoteproc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; git (AMD-Xilinx) <git@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled
> Memory (TCM) bindings
> 
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 12:11:48AM +0530, Radhey Shyam Pandey wrote:
> > Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq
> > UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree
> > and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven.
> 
> From the subject, it sounds like this is a binding for all of remoteproc for
> TCMs.
> 
> Otherwise,
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the review. Just checking if this patch will be taken through
devicetree or remoteproc tree?