Re: [PATCH v1] bus: mhi: ep: Clear channel interrupts that are unmasked

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 02:57:08AM -0700, Subramanian Ananthanarayanan wrote:
> Change is to avoid clearing of interrupts that could have been masked.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Subramanian Ananthanarayanan <quic_skananth@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Is this scenario possible in real life? We unmask all the interrupts during
power_up and later mask the interrupts specific to channels when they are
started. So I do not see a possibility where the CHDB status would be set for an
unmasked channel.

Looking at the code now, I think we can get rid of the mask check, even the
local copy of mask if there is a guarantee that doorbell interrupts won't be
enabled behind the back of the MHI stack.

IIRC, I added the mask check as the HW channel interrupts were enabled behind
the back. But that was fixed with all unmask during power_up and mask only
started channels strategy.

PS: The term "mask" is horribly used in an inverted manner in MHI.

- Mani

> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/ep/main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/ep/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/ep/main.c
> index 6008818..a818781 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/ep/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/ep/main.c
> @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void mhi_ep_check_channel_interrupt(struct mhi_ep_cntrl *mhi_cntrl)
>  		if (ch_int) {
>  			mhi_ep_queue_channel_db(mhi_cntrl, ch_int, ch_idx);
>  			mhi_ep_mmio_write(mhi_cntrl, MHI_CHDB_INT_CLEAR_n(i),
> -							mhi_cntrl->chdb[i].status);
> +							ch_int);
>  		}
>  	}
>  }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்