Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/127] 6.1.45-rc1 review

[Nathan Chancellor]

On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 01:02:54PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 09:13:39PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > 1911 is still being investigated (some additional eyes on it would not
> > hurt).
> 
> I'm hoping that we can take this one:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809072200.543939260@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> which should resolve this issue, right?

Yes, it does, as least for mainline and 6.4. The backport to 6.1 seems
hairy (due to a lack of call depth tracking me thinks). It may be worth
taking Nick's change there for simplicity's sake but I'll let y'all make
that decision.

Cheers,
Nathan