On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:51:54PM +0530, Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi wrote:
Hi,Thank you for the bug fix, Vijaya.
Thank you very much for the review...
On 8/9/2023 6:49 PM, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:Please describe the actual problem you're solving, to allow others
On Wed, 9 Aug 2023 17:41:40 +0530This is a bug fix.
Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi <quic_vnivarth@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
TX is handled by primary sequencer. After cancelling primary command, pollHi,
primary sequencer's irq status instead of that of secondary.
it is not clear to me if this is a bug fix or an improvement?
working in and around this driver to know what issue(s) are corrected.
This will save others debugging time, and it will teach others to help
you maintain this driver.
The section in the documentation on how to describe your changes is
good, please read it:
https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
Please use ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl on the upstream tree, as thisThe changes were too close by so I wasn't sure it could be split into 2While at it, also remove a couple of redundant lines that read from IRQ_ENThis should go into a separate patch.
register and write back same.
patches.
I see that the earlier patch has already been signed off by Greg. (I did a
RESEND after realising that I had Bjorn Andersson's email address incorrect)
uses up to date information about recipients.
Will post another version if original patch doesn't get merged for anyPlease double check linux-next [1], if it's unclear if Greg picked up
reason.
your previous patch (he's usually quite explicit about it...). I really
would like some more details on the bug fix...
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/
Regards,
Bjorn