Re: [PATCH v5 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor write_ctx_desc

[Michael Shavit]

On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 11:39 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Actually, I don't think this even works as nothing on the PASID path
> adds to the list that arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc_devices() iterates over ??
>
> Then the remaining two calls:
>
> arm_smmu_share_asid(struct mm_struct *mm, u16 asid)
>         arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc_devices(smmu_domain, 0, cd);
>
>         This is OK only if the sketchy assumption that the CD
>         we extracted for a conflicting ASID is not asigned to a PASID.
>
> static void arm_smmu_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
>         arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc_devices(smmu_domain, mm->pasid, &quiet_cd);
>
>         This doesn't work because we didn't add the master to the list
>         during __arm_smmu_sva_bind and this path is expressly working
>         on the PASID binds, not the RID binds.

Actually it is working on the RID attached domain (as returned by
iommu_get_domain_for_dev() at sva_bind time) not the SVA domain
here... The arm SVA implementation completely dismisses the SVA handle
(I also have a patch to fix this ;) .  Need to find the time to polish
and send out).