Re: [PATCH 1/4] genirq/irq_sim: dispose of remaining mappings before removing the domain

From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Tue Aug 15 2023 - 06:39:51 EST


On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 09:44:54PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> If the device providing simulated interrupts is unbound (real life
> example: gpio-sim is disabled with users that didn't free their irqs)
> and removes the simulated domain while interrupts are still requested,
> we will hit memory issues when they are eventually freed and the
> mappings destroyed in the process.
>
> Specifically we'll access freed memory in __irq_domain_deactivate_irq().
>
> Dispose of all mappings before removing the simulator domain.

...

> +#include <linux/list.h>

Maybe ordered?

> #include <linux/irq.h>
> #include <linux/irq_sim.h>
> #include <linux/irq_work.h>

...

> @@ -16,12 +17,14 @@ struct irq_sim_work_ctx {
> unsigned int irq_count;
> unsigned long *pending;
> struct irq_domain *domain;
> + struct list_head irqs;
> };
>
> struct irq_sim_irq_ctx {
> int irqnum;
> bool enabled;
> struct irq_sim_work_ctx *work_ctx;

> + struct list_head siblings;

You can reduce the code size by moving this to be the first member.
Not sure about struct irq_sim_work_ctx, you can play with bloat-o-meter.

> };

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko