Re: [PATCH v1] drivers: usb: Removes use of assignment in if condition
From: Atul Kumar Pant
Date: Tue Aug 15 2023 - 23:44:11 EST
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:07:02PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 02:11:41AM +0530, Atul Kumar Pant wrote:
> > This patch fixes following checkpatch.pl issue:
> > ERROR: do not use assignment in if condition
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atul Kumar Pant <atulpant.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/core/devio.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/devio.c b/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> > index e501a03d6c70..56899fed6bd4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> > @@ -2333,9 +2333,10 @@ static int proc_ioctl(struct usb_dev_state *ps, struct usbdevfs_ioctl *ctl)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + intf = usb_ifnum_to_if(ps->dev, ctl->ifno);
> > if (ps->dev->state != USB_STATE_CONFIGURED)
> > retval = -EHOSTUNREACH;
> > - else if (!(intf = usb_ifnum_to_if(ps->dev, ctl->ifno)))
> > + else if (!intf)
>
> Did you mean to change the logic here by doing the calculation always?
> Does that change functionality?
>
Now the calculation of interface will be done always, which can be
redundant. But this would not change the functionality.
> The existing code is fine, running checkpatch on code outside of
> drivers/staging/ or on new patches you are writing, is generally
> discouraged as the code usually is older than checkpatch is :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h