RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support

[Sriranjani P]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 15 August 2023 01:21
> To: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx;
> alexandre.torgue@xxxxxxxxxxx; joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> mcoquelin.stm32@xxxxxxxxx; alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> fsd@xxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; swathi.ks@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> ravi.patel@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Chandrasekar R <rcsekar@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> Suresh Siddha <ssiddha@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] net: stmmac: dwc-qos: Add FSD EQoS support
> 
> On 14/08/2023 13:25, Sriranjani P wrote:
> > The FSD SoC contains two instance of the Synopsys DWC ethernet QOS IP
> core.
> > The binding that it uses is slightly different from existing ones
> > because of the integration (clocks, resets).
> >
> > For FSD SoC, a mux switch is needed between internal and external clocks.
> > By default after reset internal clock is used but for receiving
> > packets properly, external clock is needed. Mux switch to external
> > clock happens only when the external clock is present.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chandrasekar R <rcsekar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <ssiddha@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Swathi K S <swathi.ks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sriranjani P <sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> 
> > +static int dwc_eqos_setup_rxclock(struct platform_device *pdev, int
> > +ins_num) {
> > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	struct regmap *syscon;
> > +	unsigned int reg;
> > +
> > +	if (np && of_property_read_bool(np, "fsd-rx-clock-skew")) {
> > +		syscon = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(np,
> > +							      "fsd-rx-clock-
> skew",
> > +							      1, &reg);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(syscon)) {
> > +			dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > +				"couldn't get the rx-clock-skew syscon!\n");
> > +			return PTR_ERR(syscon);
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		regmap_write(syscon, reg, rx_clock_skew_val[ins_num]);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int fsd_eqos_clk_init(struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *plat,
> > +			     struct plat_stmmacenet_data *data) {
> > +	int ret = 0, i;
> > +
> > +	const struct fsd_eqos_variant *fsd_eqos_v_data =
> > +						plat->fsd_eqos_inst_var;
> > +
> > +	plat->clks = devm_kcalloc(plat->dev, fsd_eqos_v_data->num_clks,
> > +				  sizeof(*plat->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!plat->clks)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < fsd_eqos_v_data->num_clks; i++)
> > +		plat->clks[i].id = fsd_eqos_v_data->clk_list[i];
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(plat->dev, fsd_eqos_v_data->num_clks,
> > +				plat->clks);
> 
> Instead of duplicating entire clock management with existing code, you
> should extend/rework existing one.
> 
> This code is unfortunately great example how not to stuff vendor code into
> upstream project. :(

I will check again if I can extend existing one to support FSD platform specific requirement.

> 
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int fsd_clks_endisable(void *priv, bool enabled) {
> > +	int ret, num_clks;
> > +	struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *plat = priv;
> > +
> > +	num_clks = plat->fsd_eqos_inst_var->num_clks;
> > +
> > +	if (enabled) {
> > +		ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(num_clks, plat->clks);
> > +		if (ret) {
> > +			dev_err(plat->dev, "Clock enable failed, err = %d\n",
> ret);
> > +			return ret;
> > +		}
> > +	} else {
> > +		clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(num_clks, plat->clks);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int fsd_eqos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > +			  struct plat_stmmacenet_data *data,
> > +			  struct stmmac_resources *res)
> > +{
> > +	struct fsd_eqos_plat_data *priv_plat;
> > +	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	priv_plat = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*priv_plat),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!priv_plat) {
> > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> 
> return -ENOMEM

Will fix this in v4.

> 
> > +		goto error;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	priv_plat->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +	data->bus_id = of_alias_get_id(np, "eth");
> 
> No, you cannot do like this. Aliases are board specific and are based on
> labeling on the board.

So if I understood this correctly, I need to move alias in the board specific DTS file and I can use this, because we have to handle rx-clock-skew differently for the two instances in the FSD platform. Another approach we took in v1, by specifying the value to be programmed in rx-clock-skew property itself, but it seems it is not a preferred approach. 
I can see that in drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c +436 common code is already using this API and getting alias id, so I can probably use the same rather getting same again here, but I have to specify alias in DTS file.

> 
> > +
> > +	priv_plat->fsd_eqos_inst_var = &fsd_eqos_clk_info[data->bus_id];
> > +
> > +	ret = fsd_eqos_clk_init(priv_plat, data);
> > +
> > +	data->bsp_priv = priv_plat;
> > +	data->clks_config = fsd_clks_endisable;
> > +	data->rxmux_setup = dwc_eqos_rxmux_setup;
> > +
> > +	ret = fsd_clks_endisable(priv_plat, true);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto error;
> > +
> > +	ret = dwc_eqos_setup_rxclock(pdev, data->bus_id);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		fsd_clks_endisable(priv_plat, false);
> > +		dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Unable to setup
> rxclock\n");
> 
> The syntax is: return dev_err_probe().

Will fix it in v4.

> 
> > +	}
> > +
> > +error:
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> ....
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof