Re: [PATCH 1/2] m68k: define __div64_32() to avoid a warning

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 11:11 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> The generic __div64_32() definition is built on all architectures that don't
> provide this as a macro. m68k however neither defines nor requires __div64_32,
> so it should define an empty one to avoid the warning:
>
> lib/math/div64.c:31:32: error: no previous prototype for '__div64_32' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Nice! 142 bytes saved (which do not show up with bloat-o-meter,
as it does not count weak symbols; patch sent).

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
i.e. will queue in the m68k for-v6.6 branch.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds