Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iov_iter: Don't deal with iter->copy_mc in memcpy_from_iter_mc()

[David Howells]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > What about ITER_BVEC_MC ??
> 
> That probably would be the best option. Just make it a proper
> ITER_xyz, instead of an odd sub-case for one ITER (but set up in such
> a way that it looks like it might happen for other ITER_xyz cases).

I'm not sure that buys us anything.  It would then require every call to
iov_iter_is_bvec()[*] to check for two values instead of one - including in
iterate_and_advance() - and *still* we'd have to have the special-casing in
_copy_from_iter() and copy_page_from_iter_atomic().

The issue is that ITER_xyz changes the iteration function - but we don't
actually want to do that; rather, we need to change the step function.

David

[*] There's a bunch of them outside of iov_iter.c.