On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 3:49 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:If we go with setting up 1:1 DMA mapping at virtio-vdpa .probe() and tearing it down at .release(), perhaps set_map(NULL) is not sufficient.
I meant the bus tries to hide the differences among vendors. So it
On 8/14/2023 7:21 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:46 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Not sure what does it mean by "device internal", but this op callback
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>This exposes the device internal to the upper layer which is not optimal.
---
include/linux/vdpa.h | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
index db1b0ea..3a3878d 100644
--- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
+++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
@@ -314,6 +314,12 @@ struct vdpa_map_file {
* @iova: iova to be unmapped
* @size: size of the area
* Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
+ * @reset_map: Reset device memory mapping (optional)
+ * Needed for device that using device
+ * specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
just follows existing convention to describe what vdpa parent this API
targets.
needs to hide on-chip IOMMU stuff to the upper layer.
We can expose two dimensional IO mappings models but it looks like
over engineering for this issue. More below.
* @set_map: Set device memory mapping (optional)We can do this simple change if it can work.
* Needed for device that using device
* specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
:
:
* @dma_map: Map an area of PA to IOVA (optional)
* Needed for device that using device
* specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
* and preferring incremental map.
:
:
* @dma_unmap: Unmap an area of IOVA (optional but
* must be implemented with dma_map)
* Needed for device that using device
* specific DMA translation (on-chip IOMMU)
* and preferring incremental unmap.
Btw, what's the difference between this and a simpleI don't think parent drivers support this today - they can accept
set_map(NULL)?
non-NULL iotlb containing empty map entry, but not a NULL iotlb. The
behavior is undefined or it even causes panic when a NULL iotlb is
passed in.
OK, at a point there was suggestion to get this incremental API extended to support batching to be in par with or even replace .set_map, not sure if it's too soon to conclude. But I'm okay with the removal if need be.
Further this doesn't work with .dma_map parent drivers.Probably, but I'd remove dma_map as it doesn't have any real users
except for the simulator.
A feature flag is needed anyway. I'm fine with reusing but guess I'd want to converge on the direction first.
The reason why a new op is needed or better is because it allowsI'm ok with a new feature flag, but we need to first seek a way to
userspace to tell apart different reset behavior from the older kernel
(via the F_IOTLB_PERSIST feature bit in patch 4), while this behavior
could vary between parent drivers.
reuse the existing API.
Thanks
Regards,
-Siwei
Thanks
+ * @vdev: vdpa device
+ * @asid: address space identifier
+ * Returns integer: success (0) or error (< 0)
* @get_vq_dma_dev: Get the dma device for a specific
* virtqueue (optional)
* @vdev: vdpa device
@@ -390,6 +396,7 @@ struct vdpa_config_ops {
u64 iova, u64 size, u64 pa, u32 perm, void *opaque);
int (*dma_unmap)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int asid,
u64 iova, u64 size);
+ int (*reset_map)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int asid);
int (*set_group_asid)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned int group,
unsigned int asid);
struct device *(*get_vq_dma_dev)(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx);
--
1.8.3.1