Re: [PATCH 5.17 127/298] driver core: Fix wait_for_device_probe() & deferred_probe_timeout interaction

[Shreeya Patel]

Hi Greg,

On 16/08/23 20:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 03:09:27PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> > On 13/06/22 15:40, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > From: Saravana Kannan<saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit 5ee76c256e928455212ab759c51d198fedbe7523 ]
> > >
> > > Mounting NFS rootfs was timing out when deferred_probe_timeout was
> > > non-zero [1].  This was because ip_auto_config() initcall times out
> > > waiting for the network interfaces to show up when
> > > deferred_probe_timeout was non-zero. While ip_auto_config() calls
> > > wait_for_device_probe() to make sure any currently running deferred
> > > probe work or asynchronous probe finishes, that wasn't sufficient to
> > > account for devices being deferred until deferred_probe_timeout.
> > >
> > > Commit 35a672363ab3 ("driver core: Ensure wait_for_device_probe() waits
> > > until the deferred_probe_timeout fires") tried to fix that by making
> > > sure wait_for_device_probe() waits for deferred_probe_timeout to expire
> > > before returning.
> > >
> > > However, if wait_for_device_probe() is called from the kernel_init()
> > > context:
> > >
> > > - Before deferred_probe_initcall() [2], it causes the boot process to
> > >     hang due to a deadlock.
> > >
> > > - After deferred_probe_initcall() [3], it blocks kernel_init() from
> > >     continuing till deferred_probe_timeout expires and beats the point of
> > >     deferred_probe_timeout that's trying to wait for userspace to load
> > >     modules.
> > >
> > > Neither of this is good. So revert the changes to
> > > wait_for_device_probe().
> > >
> > > [1] -https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/TYAPR01MB45443DF63B9EF29054F7C41FD8C60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > [2] -https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YowHNo4sBjr9ijZr@dev-arch.thelio-3990X/
> > > [3] -https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yo3WvGnNk3LvLb7R@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > Hi Saravana, Greg,
> >
> >
> > KernelCI found this patch causes the baseline.bootrr.deferred-probe-empty test to fail on r8a77960-ulcb,
> > see the following details for more information.
> >
> > KernelCI dashboard link:
> > https://linux.kernelci.org/test/plan/id/64d2a6be8c1a8435e535b264/
> >
> > Error messages from the logs :-
> >
> > + UUID=11236495_1.5.2.4.5
> > + set +x
> > + export 'PATH=/opt/bootrr/libexec/bootrr/helpers:/lava-11236495/1/../bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin'
> > + cd /opt/bootrr/libexec/bootrr
> > + sh helpers/bootrr-auto
> > e6800000.ethernet	
> > e6700000.dma-controller	
> > e7300000.dma-controller	
> > e7310000.dma-controller	
> > ec700000.dma-controller	
> > ec720000.dma-controller	
> > fea20000.vsp	
> > feb00000.display	
> > fea28000.vsp	
> > fea30000.vsp	
> > fe9a0000.vsp	
> > fe9af000.fcp	
> > fea27000.fcp	
> > fea2f000.fcp	
> > fea37000.fcp	
> > sound	
> > ee100000.mmc	
> > ee140000.mmc	
> > ec500000.sound	
> > /lava-11236495/1/../bin/lava-test-case
> > <8>[   17.476741] <LAVA_SIGNAL_TESTCASE TEST_CASE_ID=deferred-probe-empty RESULT=fail>
> >
> > Test case failing :-
> > Baseline Bootrr deferred-probe-empty test -https://github.com/kernelci/bootrr/blob/main/helpers/bootrr-generic-tests
> >
> > Regression Reproduced :-
> >
> > Lava job after reverting the commit 5ee76c256e92
> > https://lava.collabora.dev/scheduler/job/11292890
> >
> >
> > Bisection report from KernelCI can be found at the bottom of the email.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shreeya Patel
> >
> > #regzbot introduced: 5ee76c256e92
> > #regzbot title: KernelCI: Multiple devices deferring on r8a77960-ulcb
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
> > * If you do send a fix, please include this trailer: *
> > * Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@...> *
> > * *
> > * Hope this helps! *
> > * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> >
> > stable-rc/linux-5.10.y bisection: baseline.bootrr.deferred-probe-empty on
> > r8a77960-ulcb
> You are testing 5.10.y, yet the subject says 5.17?
>
> Which is it here?

Sorry, I accidentally used the lore link for 5.17 while reporting this 
issue,
but this test does fail on all the stable releases from 5.10 onwards.

stable 5.15 :- 
https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/64dd156a5ac58d0cf335b1ea/
mainline :- 
https://linux.kernelci.org/test/case/id/64dc13d55cb51357a135b209/

Thanks,
Shreeya Patel

> confused,
>
> greg k-h