Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: dt-bindings: fsl_easrc: Add support for imx8mp-easrc

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 20/08/2023 23:05, Adam Ford wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/08/2023 22:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/08/2023 19:56, Adam Ford wrote:
>>>> The i.MX8MP appears to have the same easrc support as the Nano, so
>>>> add imx8mp as an option with a fallback to imx8mn.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
>>>> index bdde68a1059c..2d53b3b10f2c 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl,easrc.yaml
>>>> @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ properties:
>>>>      pattern: "^easrc@.*"
>>>>
>>>>    compatible:
>>>> -    const: fsl,imx8mn-easrc
>>>> +    oneOf:
>>>> +      - items:
>>>> +          - enum:
>>>> +              - fsl,imx8mp-easrc
>>>> +          - const: fsl,imx8mn-easrc
>>>
>>> You need here also const for fsl,imx8mn-easrc, otherwise you do not
>>> allow it alone. Test it for fsl,imx8mn-easrc DTS - you will notice warnings.
>>
>> Actually, I see now Rob's report... you did not have to test DTS even.
>> It was enough to test your change and this test was missing :(. Please
>> test your changes before sending.
> 
> For what it's worth, I did run 'make dt_binding_check', but I didn't
> run it with the extra flags from Rob's e-mail.  The tool didn't return
> any errors.

OK, indeed without the additional flags the example from that binding
won't be reported as undocumented compatible.

Best regards,
Krzysztof