Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Support 32_PCREL relocation type in kernel module

[Nylon Chen]

Hi Andreas,

Currently, due to the lack of support for the unwind table in RISC-V,
we have disabled it.

If RISC-V were to support the unwind table in the future, would we
need to re-enable it? Would this require implementing related
changes(module relocation type handler) at that time?

Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2023年6月15日 週四 下午5:47寫道：


Nylon Chen <nylon.chen@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2023年6月15日 週四 下午5:47寫道：
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:11:49AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > On Jun 15 2023, Nylon Chen wrote:
> >
> Hi Andreas,
> > > Because LLVM currently has it enabled by default(https://reviews.llvm.org/D145164), it will generate this
> > > relocation type.
> > >
> > >>From what I know, GCC will also enable it in the future.
> >
> > That's why the kernel explicitly disables it.
> Ok, thanks for your feedback, after I cross-tested, there is indeed no relevant relocation type generated.
>
> If this error no longer occurs.
>
> I am open to the idea of adding this patch to the upstream and would like to hear your thoughts on whether it is still necessary.
> >
> > --
> > Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@xxxxxxx
> > GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE  1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
> > "And now for something completely different."