Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: migrate: move migration validation into numa_migrate_prep()

From: Baolin Wang
Date: Mon Aug 21 2023 - 03:53:01 EST




On 8/21/2023 10:20 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Now there are 3 places will validate if a page can mirate or not, and
some validations are performed later, which will waste some CPU to call
numa_migrate_prep().

Thus we can move all the migration validation into numa_migrate_prep(),
which is more maintainable as well as saving some CPU resources. Another
benefit is that it can serve as a preparation for supporting batch migration
in do_numa_page() in future.

Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
mm/migrate.c | 19 -------------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index d003076b218d..bee9b1e86ef0 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4747,6 +4747,25 @@ int numa_migrate_prep(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
*flags |= TNF_FAULT_LOCAL;
}
+ /*
+ * Don't migrate file pages that are mapped in multiple processes
+ * with execute permissions as they are probably shared libraries.
+ */
+ if (page_mapcount(page) != 1 && page_is_file_lru(page) &&
+ (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+
+ /*
+ * Also do not migrate dirty pages as not all filesystems can move
+ * dirty pages in MIGRATE_ASYNC mode which is a waste of cycles.
+ */
+ if (page_is_file_lru(page) && PageDirty(page))
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+
+ /* Do not migrate THP mapped by multiple processes */
+ if (PageTransHuge(page) && total_mapcount(page) > 1)
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+
return mpol_misplaced(page, vma, addr);

In mpol_misplaced()->should_numa_migrate_memory(), accessing CPU and PID
will be recorded. So the code change above will introduce some behavior
change.

Indeed.


How about move these checks into a separate function which is called
between numa_migrate_prep() and migrate_misplaced_page() after unlocking
PTL?

Sounds reasonable to me. Thanks for your input.


--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

}
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index e21d5a7e7447..9cc98fb1d6ec 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -2485,10 +2485,6 @@ static int numamigrate_isolate_page(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct page *page)
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(order && !PageTransHuge(page), page);
- /* Do not migrate THP mapped by multiple processes */
- if (PageTransHuge(page) && total_mapcount(page) > 1)
- return 0;
-
/* Avoid migrating to a node that is nearly full */
if (!migrate_balanced_pgdat(pgdat, nr_pages)) {
int z;
@@ -2533,21 +2529,6 @@ int migrate_misplaced_page(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
LIST_HEAD(migratepages);
int nr_pages = thp_nr_pages(page);
- /*
- * Don't migrate file pages that are mapped in multiple processes
- * with execute permissions as they are probably shared libraries.
- */
- if (page_mapcount(page) != 1 && page_is_file_lru(page) &&
- (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
- goto out;
-
- /*
- * Also do not migrate dirty pages as not all filesystems can move
- * dirty pages in MIGRATE_ASYNC mode which is a waste of cycles.
- */
- if (page_is_file_lru(page) && PageDirty(page))
- goto out;
-
isolated = numamigrate_isolate_page(pgdat, page);
if (!isolated)
goto out;