Re: [RFC][PATCH] kconfig: introduce listunknownconfig
From: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Mon Aug 21 2023 - 08:27:53 EST
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:15 PM Sergey Senozhatsky
<senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On (23/08/20 16:21), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > What the preferred approach would be? Do we want a new KCONFIG_FOO env
> > variable that changes behaviour of one of the targets? E.g.
> >
> > KCONFIG_LIST_MISSING=1 make oldconfig
> >
> > and then have conf list symbols and terminate with exit(1) if there are
> > some unrecognized symbols?
>
>
> Will something like this be OK with you?
>
>
> KCONFIG_LIST_MISSING=1 make oldconfig
>
> .config:6:warning: unknown symbol: DISABLE_BUGS
> .config:7:warning: unknown unset symbol: ENABLE_WINAPI
>
> make[2]: *** [scripts/kconfig/Makefile:77: oldconfig] Error 1
>
Yup, much better than adding a new target.
> ---
>
> diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c b/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
> index fa2ae6f63352..b2c0bcf0e5c1 100644
> --- a/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
> +++ b/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
> @@ -360,7 +360,9 @@ int conf_read_simple(const char *name, int def)
> char *p, *p2;
> struct symbol *sym;
> int i, def_flags;
> + const char *list_missing;
>
> + list_missing = getenv("KCONFIG_LIST_MISSING");
My (original) hope was to add a single switch, KCONFIG_VERBOSE, to address both:
- A CONFIG option is hidden by unmet dependency (Ying Sun's case)
- A CONFIG option no longer exists (your case)
- Anything else we need to be careful
> if (name) {
> in = zconf_fopen(name);
> } else {
> @@ -448,6 +450,12 @@ int conf_read_simple(const char *name, int def)
> if (def == S_DEF_USER) {
> sym = sym_find(line + 2 + strlen(CONFIG_));
> if (!sym) {
> + if (list_missing) {
> + conf_warning("unknown unset symbol: %s",
> + line + 2 + strlen(CONFIG_));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> conf_set_changed(true);
> continue;
> }
> @@ -482,6 +490,12 @@ int conf_read_simple(const char *name, int def)
>
> sym = sym_find(line + strlen(CONFIG_));
> if (!sym) {
> + if (list_missing) {
> + conf_warning("unknown symbol: %s",
> + line + strlen(CONFIG_));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
This should be warned only if (def != S_DEF_AUTO),
otherwise the same warning will be displayed twice.
> if (def == S_DEF_AUTO)
> /*
> * Reading from include/config/auto.conf
> @@ -530,6 +544,13 @@ int conf_read_simple(const char *name, int def)
> }
> free(line);
> fclose(in);
> +
> + if (list_missing) {
> + if (conf_warnings)
> + exit(1);
> + exit(0);
> + }
> +
This is something different because you are making these
errors instead of warnings.
> return 0;
> }
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada