Re: [PATCH] Add Silicom Platform Driver

[Guenter Roeck]

On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:48:33PM +0000, Huibin Shi wrote:
> Guenter,
> 
> See my comments below.
> 
> Thanks
> Henry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2023 10:36 AM
> To: Huibin Shi <henrys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Henry Shi <henryshi2018@xxxxxxxxx>; hbshi69@xxxxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; markgross@xxxxxxxxxx; jdelvare@xxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; hb_shi2003@xxxxxxxxx; Wen Wang <wenw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add Silicom Platform Driver
> 
> Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments.
> 
> 
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 02:20:32PM +0000, Huibin Shi wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > Thanks for your comments. Probably, I should not resubmit patch too rushed. I will add version number to subject and change log in cover letter for next resubmission.
> >
> > See my comments below. Please let me know whether you accept my explanation.
> >
> > Henry
> > -----Original Message-----
> [ ... ]
> 
> > > +
> > > +static u32 temp_get(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     u32 reg;
> > > +
> > > +     mutex_lock(&mec_io_mutex);
> > > +     /* Select memory region */
> > > +     outb(IO_REG_BANK, EC_ADDR_MSB);
> > > +     outb(0xc, EC_ADDR_LSB);
> > > +     /* Get current data from the address */
> > > +     reg = inl(MEC_DATA(DEFAULT_CHAN_LO));
> > > +     mutex_unlock(&mec_io_mutex);
> > > +
> > > +     return (reg >> 16) / 10;
> >
> > The hwmon ABI expects temperatures to be reported in milli-degrees C.
> > The above sets the maximum temperature to 65,535 / 10 = 6,553 milli-degrees or 6.553 degrees C. It is very unlikely that this is correct.
> >
> > Again, I commented on this before.
> >
> > Henry: this is due to an internal implementation of MIcor-controller firmware, instead of putting real temperature to the register, it put (real temperature * 10 ) to the register. So, in order to report correct temperature to user space application, the read value is divided by 10, then report to user space.
> >
> > Please let me know if you accept this. If not, I can change the code, but let user space application to do adjustment.
> 
> No, I do not accept this. I do not believe that the maximum temperature reported by the microcontroller is 6.553 degrees C. I suspect it reports 10th of degrees C. In that case, the number reported should be multiplied by 100 to make it milli-degrees C as expected by the ABI.
> 
> Henry: OK, I will remove "/10" in driver, and let user space application (or script) to the calculation.
> 

Sorry, I completely fail to understand why you refuse to follow the ABI.
The temperature must be reported in milli-degrees C, not in some arbitrary
unit, period.

FWIW, that really deserves a NACK now.

Guenter