linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the djw-vfs, vfs-brauner trees

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:

  fs/super.c

between commits:

  0ed33598ddf3 ("super: use locking helpers")
  5e8749141521 ("super: wait for nascent superblocks")
  880b9577855e ("fs: distinguish between user initiated freeze and kernel initiated freeze")

from the djw-vfs, vfs-brauner trees and commit:

  4a8b719f95c0 ("fs: remove emergency_thaw_bdev")

from the block tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/super.c
index 5062ca612e0d,bc666e7ee1a9..000000000000
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@@ -1196,13 -1027,14 +1196,15 @@@ void emergency_remount(void
  
  static void do_thaw_all_callback(struct super_block *sb)
  {
 -	down_write(&sb->s_umount);
 -	if (sb->s_root && sb->s_flags & SB_BORN) {
 +	bool born = super_lock_excl(sb);
 +
 +	if (born && sb->s_root) {
- 		emergency_thaw_bdev(sb);
+ 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLOCK))
+ 			while (sb->s_bdev && !thaw_bdev(sb->s_bdev))
+ 				pr_warn("Emergency Thaw on %pg\n", sb->s_bdev);
 -		thaw_super_locked(sb);
 +		thaw_super_locked(sb, FREEZE_HOLDER_USERSPACE);
  	} else {
 -		up_write(&sb->s_umount);
 +		super_unlock_excl(sb);
  	}
  }

Attachment: pgpUhTcVCjw5o.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature