Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: allow i and j as RPMh resource name suffix

From: Konrad Dybcio
Date: Tue Aug 22 2023 - 05:28:28 EST

Next message: Steven Rostedt (Google): "[PATCH] tracefs: Remove kerneldoc from struct eventfs_file"
Previous message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: [PATCH] bus: ti-sysc: Use fsleep() instead of usleep_range() in sysc_reset()"
In reply to: Neil Armstrong: "[PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: allow i and j as RPMh resource name suffix"
Next in thread: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: allow i and j as RPMh resource name suffix"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 22.08.2023 11:27, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add "i" and "j" to the allowed subffix list as they can be used as RPMh
> resource name suffixes on new platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
Also 'n' and 'm' for 8550

Konrad

Next message: Steven Rostedt (Google): "[PATCH] tracefs: Remove kerneldoc from struct eventfs_file"
Previous message: Tony Lindgren: "Re: [PATCH] bus: ti-sysc: Use fsleep() instead of usleep_range() in sysc_reset()"
In reply to: Neil Armstrong: "[PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: allow i and j as RPMh resource name suffix"
Next in thread: Konrad Dybcio: "Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: allow i and j as RPMh resource name suffix"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]