Re: [PATCH 4/5] net: stmmac: Add glue layer for Loongson-1 SoC
From: Serge Semin
Date: Tue Aug 22 2023 - 10:20:47 EST
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 08:09:12PM +0800, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 6:53 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 03:58:32PM +0800, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:16 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 09:24:17PM +0800, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 12:19 AM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 08:37:27PM +0800, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 9:30 PM Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 11:11:34PM +0800, Keguang Zhang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > This glue driver is created based on the arch-code
> > > > > > > > > implemented earlier with the platform-specific settings.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Use syscon for SYSCON register access.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Partialy based on the previous work by Serge Semin.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig | 11 +
> > > > > > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > > > > > .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson1.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > 3 files changed, 269 insertions(+)
> > > > > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson1.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > > > > > > > > index 06c6871f8788..a2b9e289aa36 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Kconfig
> > > > > > > > > @@ -239,6 +239,17 @@ config DWMAC_INTEL_PLAT
> > > > > > > > > the stmmac device driver. This driver is used for the Intel Keem Bay
> > > > > > > > > SoC.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +config DWMAC_LOONGSON1
> > > > > > > > > + tristate "Loongson1 GMAC support"
> > > > > > > > > + default MACH_LOONGSON32
> > > > > > > > > + depends on OF && (MACH_LOONGSON32 || COMPILE_TEST)
> > > > > > > > > + help
> > > > > > > > > + Support for ethernet controller on Loongson1 SoC.
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + This selects Loongson1 SoC glue layer support for the stmmac
> > > > > > > > > + device driver. This driver is used for Loongson1-based boards
> > > > > > > > > + like Loongson LS1B/LS1C.
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > config DWMAC_TEGRA
> > > > > > > > > tristate "NVIDIA Tegra MGBE support"
> > > > > > > > > depends on ARCH_TEGRA || COMPILE_TEST
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > index 5b57aee19267..80e598bd4255 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/Makefile
> > > > > > > > > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_SUNXI) += dwmac-sunxi.o
> > > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_SUN8I) += dwmac-sun8i.o
> > > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_DWC_QOS_ETH) += dwmac-dwc-qos-eth.o
> > > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_INTEL_PLAT) += dwmac-intel-plat.o
> > > > > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_LOONGSON1) += dwmac-loongson1.o
> > > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_GENERIC) += dwmac-generic.o
> > > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_IMX8) += dwmac-imx.o
> > > > > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_DWMAC_TEGRA) += dwmac-tegra.o
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson1.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson1.c
> > > > > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > > > > index 000000000000..368d6cd2cb78
> > > > > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-loongson1.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
> > > > > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > > > > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > > > > + * Loongson-1 DWMAC glue layer
> > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2011-2023 Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/phy.h>
> > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > > > > > > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +#include "stmmac.h"
> > > > > > > > > +#include "stmmac_platform.h"
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +/* Loongson-1 SYSCON Registers */
> > > > > > > > > +#define LS1X_SYSCON0 (0x0)
> > > > > > > > > +#define LS1X_SYSCON1 (0x4)
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +struct ls1x_dwmac_syscon {
> > > > > > > > > + const struct reg_field *reg_fields;
> > > > > > > > > + unsigned int nr_reg_fields;
> > > > > > > > > + int (*syscon_init)(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat);
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +struct ls1x_dwmac {
> > > > > > > > > + struct device *dev;
> > > > > > > > > + struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat;
> > > > > > > > > + const struct ls1x_dwmac_syscon *syscon;
> > > > > > > > > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > > > > > > + struct regmap_field *regmap_fields[];
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +enum ls1b_dwmac_syscon_regfield {
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_UART1,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_UART0,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC1_SHUT,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC0_SHUT,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_TXCLK,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC0_USE_TXCLK,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_PWM23,
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC0_USE_PWM01,
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +enum ls1c_dwmac_syscon_regfield {
> > > > > > > > > + GMAC_SHUT,
> > > > > > > > > + PHY_INTF_SELI,
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +const struct reg_field ls1b_dwmac_syscon_regfields[] = {
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC1_USE_UART1] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON0, 4, 4),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC1_USE_UART0] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON0, 3, 3),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC1_SHUT] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 13, 13),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC0_SHUT] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 12, 12),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC1_USE_TXCLK] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 3, 3),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC0_USE_TXCLK] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 2, 2),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC1_USE_PWM23] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 1, 1),
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC0_USE_PWM01] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 0, 0)
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +const struct reg_field ls1c_dwmac_syscon_regfields[] = {
> > > > > > > > > + [GMAC_SHUT] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON0, 6, 6),
> > > > > > > > > + [PHY_INTF_SELI] = REG_FIELD(LS1X_SYSCON1, 28, 30)
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Emm, using regmap fields looks so over-complicated in this case seeing
> > > > > > > > you only need to set/clear several bits in the syscon. What about
> > > > > > > > defining macros with the particular flag as it's already done in the
> > > > > > > > "asm/mach-loongson32/regs-mux.h" file and using regmap_update_bits()?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > To use regmap_update_bits(), I have to store and pass reg_offset and
> > > > > > > mask, which is similar to the definition of regmap fields.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em, not really. And what offset are you talking about? Anyway you
> > > > > > don't need one. Moreover you'll be able to reduce the number of IOs:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +#define GMAC1_USE_UART1 BIT(4)
> > > > > > +#define GMAC1_USE_UART0 BIT(3)
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > +#define GMAC1_SHUT BIT(13)
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > +#define GMAC1_USE_TXCLK BIT(3)
> > > > > > +#define GMAC1_USE_PWM23 BIT(1)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +static int ls1b_dwmac_syscon_init(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + struct ls1x_dwmac *dwmac = plat->bsp_priv;
> > > > > > + struct regmap *syscon = dwmac->regmap;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + if (plat->bus_id) {
> > > > > > + regmap_update_bits(syscon, LS1X_SYSCON0,
> > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_UART1 | GMAC1_USE_UART0,
> > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_UART1 | GMAC1_USE_UART0);
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + switch (plat->phy_interface) {
> > > > > > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> > > > > > + regmap_update_bits(syscon, LS1X_SYSCON1,
> > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_TXCLK | GMAC1_USE_TXCLK, 0);
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
> > > > > > + regmap_update_bits(syscon, LS1X_SYSCON1,
> > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_TXCLK | GMAC1_USE_TXCLK
> > > > > > + GMAC1_USE_TXCLK | GMAC1_USE_TXCLK);
> > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > + default:
> > > > > > + dev_err(dwmac->dev, "Unsupported PHY mode %u\n",
> > > > > > + plat->phy_interface);
> > > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + regmap_field_write(syscon, LS1X_SYSCON1, GMAC1_SHUT, 0);
> > > > > > + } //...
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This doesn't look in anyway less readable then your implementation
> > > > > > but in fact simpler.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > In addition, the regmap fields are very clear and leave the trouble to
> > > > > > > the internal implementation.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In this case it brings much more troubles and no clarity. You need to create
> > > > > > an additional mainly redundant abstraction, waste memory for it,
> > > > > > define additional const arrays. Using it won't improve the code
> > > > > > readability seeing you need to set/clear a few flags only. So all of
> > > > > > the troubles for nothing. See the code above. It's simple and clear.
> > > > > > Just several regmap_update_bits()..
> > > > > >
> > > > > OK. I will use regmap instead of regmap fields.
> > > > >
> > > > > > BTW why have you chosen to define syscon instead of creating a pinctrl
> > > > > > driver? What if Loongson1 is embedded into a platform with, for
> > > > > > instance, UART0 and UART1 utilized instead of the GMAC1?
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > As you can see, the two registers contains miscellaneous settings.
> > > > > Besides ‘USE’ bits, there are ‘RESET‘ bits, 'EN' bits, 'SHUT' bits, ...
> > > > > So they are not pinctrl registers.
> > > >
> > > > You could have defined a device node which would export "reset",
> > > > "power" and "pinctrl" functionality, like it's normally done for the
> > > > RCU devices (Reset and Clock unit devices).
> > > >
> > > > > Actually, there is a dedicated pin controller which controls the
> > > > > multiplexing of pads.
> > > >
> > > > Do you mean that there is another controller in the Loongson1 SoC
> > > > which controls the pads multiplexing?
> > > >
> > > Yes. There is another contoller that really controls the pads multiplexing.
> > >
> > > > If so what is the purpose of the GMAC1_USE_UART1, GMAC1_USE_UART0 and
> > > > GMAC1_USE_TXCLK, GMAC1_USE_PWM23 flags in MUX controller then? Is it
> > > > just another pinctl space with additional reset/power controls or what?
> > > >
> >
> > > From my perspective, these ‘USE’ bits should be regarded as
> > > device/module multiplexing rather than pads multiplexing.
> >
> > Could you elaborate what does "device/module multiplexing" mean?
> >
> Pherhaps the device switch is more accurate.
> Just means which devices could not work at the time.
What does it mean exactly? What changes if you get to set these flags
and get them cleared? Are the CSRs still accessible? Does the pads
function change? What the HW-manual say about for instance the
GMAC1_USE_UART1, GMAC1_USE_UART0, GMAC1_USE_TXCLK and GMAC1_USE_PWM23
flags? What does your "not working at the time" mean? What happens if
you get to access and use the devices simultaneously?
I don't understand what is the point of having the deviceis toggle
functionality if there is already pin-controller available. If it doesn't
switch the pins function, if it doesn't switch the CSRs space mapping,
then what is it needed for?
>
> > > Although the two registers were called MUX_CTRL in LS1B datasheet,
> > > they had beed renamed to MISC_CTRL in LS1C datasheet.
> > > So it is supposed to be considered syscon.
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +static int ls1b_dwmac_syscon_init(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
> > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As I already told you this part is better to be called from the
> > > > > > > > plat_stmmacenet_data.fix_mac_speed() because PHY interface mode can
> > > > > > > > differ from one interface open cycle to another as per the phylink
> > > > > > > > design.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I have considered .fix_mac_speed(), which will be called every time
> > > > > > > the link is up, and passes the current speed.
> > > > > > > However, the PHY interface mode is determined by the hardware design -
> > > > > > > the schematic.
> > > > > > > In other words, once the schematic is done, the PHY interface mode is fixed.
> > > > > > > Therefore, PHY interface mode should be configured one time at the
> > > > > > > initialization.
> > > > > > > And the plat_stmmacenet_data.init() is the proper place to do this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok. If no actual clock change is needed then indeed init() will be the
> > > > > > proper place.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + struct ls1x_dwmac *dwmac = plat->bsp_priv;
> > > > > > > > > + struct regmap_field **regmap_fields = dwmac->regmap_fields;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + if (plat->bus_id) {
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Using bus_id doesn't look correct to determine the CSRs responsible
> > > > > > > > for the interface mode selection because it's calculated based on the
> > > > > > > > DT ethernet-alias which doesn't guarantee to have a particular device
> > > > > > > > assigned with the alias. Alias node can be absent after all. What
> > > > > > > > could be better in this case is for instance to use the regs physical
> > > > > > > > address. Any better idea?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > The purpose of alias is to bind the a particular device with a
> > > > > > > particular alias even some aliases are absent.
> > > > > > > Because of_alias_get_id() gets the alias id.
> > > > > > > For example, LS1B has two GMAC controllers, gmac0 and gmac1.
> > > > > > > I have tried the Ethernet with only one alias as follows.
> > > > > > > aliases {
> > > > > > > ethernet1 = &gmac1;
> > > > > > > };
> > > > > > > In this case, plat->bus_id is still 1.
> > > > > > > And both gmac0 and gmac1 work.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If no alias specified? If both aliases a non zero? If the IDs are
> > > > > > confused? If any of these is true you are in trouble. Your code
> > > > > > shouldn't rely on the aliases in this case. You need to come up with a
> > > > > > way to certainly distinguish one MAC from another. A physical base
> > > > > > address is one possible option.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I see.
> > > > > But It seems unusual to determine device IDs by physical base address.
> > > > > What about adding a new property? such as loongson,dwmac-id
> > > >
> > > > IMO It's better to have a DT-property-independent way for it. If I
> > > > were you I would have utilized the reg-space
> > > > physical-base-address-based approach since you need to have it
> > > > specified anyway and it determines the particular MAC for sure.
> > > > Thus your driver won't be dependent in the device tree in that aspect.
> > > >
> >
> > > The physical base address may vary from SoC to SoC.
> >
> > You've got only two SoCs, right? LS1C and LS1B. Each of them has
> > a specific set of NICs: two loongson,ls1b-gmac on LS1B and
> > one loongson,ls1c-mac on LS1C. So LS1B has only two physical addresses
> > you can use to distinguish one interface from another and find out
> > what flags to toggle in the syscon. LS1C has a single MAC so you won't
> > even need any additional info since there is only one flag to
> > toggle.
> >
> Is there any driver that uses the physical-base-address way?
> Could you provide me some existing examples?
For what? Do you need a reference of how to implement that? Or do you
want a proof that it's eligible just because somebody sometime ago has
developed such approach and it was merged into the kernel? Just for
the record even if something can be found in the kernel it doesn't
mean it's always the best practice especially if we are considering
the STMMAC driver which is full of weak and bogus patterns.
Anyway, see my comment in the previous message which you skipped for
some reason +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
> Thanks |
> |
> > Physical address is constant from one LS1C instance to another, and |
> > similarly from one LS1B instance to another. It's defined by means |
> > of the macros: |
> > LS1X_GMAC0_BASE |
> > LS1X_GMAC1_BASE |
> > What physical address varying are you talking about? I don't see that |
> > in the current platform driver. |
> > |
> > > It means that the driver has to remember MAC base addresses for different |
> > > SoCs. |
> > |
> > Yes. Just two physical addresses. |
> > |
|
> Two chips for now. |
> What about the future chips? |
|
Any future chips will require the driver update anyway because of |
the way your syscon-related code is designed and considering the |
fact that they will have specific system controller anyway. But |
again see my comment in the previous message +----------------------------------+
|
> > > |
> > > > Some DW *MAC drivers pass additional number to the syscon phandle node |
> > > > in the syscon-property to identify the MAC on the board, like |
> > > > dwmac-socfpga.c or dwmac-sti.c. If you get to implement a similar way |
> > > > then you'll need to have the DT-bindings properly describing that. But |
> > > > IMO my approach seems less clumsy and simpler. |
> > > > |
> > |
> > > I prefer the DT-bindings property way. At least many off-the-shelf |
> > > examples can be found. |
> > |
> > Just two examples with not the best solution implemented. |
> > |
|
> > Anyway it's up to you to decide after all. I don't mind if it will be <----+
> > the property-based way. But as for me it looks redundant seeing there
> > is base address always available and which you can utilise. Moreover
> > if you get to add any new Loongson MAC to the driver you'll need to
> > update it anyway at least in a way the syscon flags are toggled. So
> > even from that perspective using the physical base address seems as at
> > least the equally complex and maintainable solution.
-Serge(y)
> >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Note the /alias node is an informational node. It doesn't describe
> > > > > > devices. Just recent Krzysztof comment in a similar situation:
> > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230814112539.70453-1-sriranjani.p@xxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m3972e40bd2fa323a3bdb2fbf07bde47ba6752439
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Aliases are normally used by OS to for instance fix the device
> > > > > > enumeration (see SPI, I2C, I3C, MTD, MMC, RTC, TTY/Serial, Watchdog,
> > > > > > MDIO-GPIO, etc) - pre-define the device ID from the kernel or OS point
> > > > > > of view. In your case the IDs can't be changed. GMAC0 must be assigned
> > > > > > with ID0 and GMAC1 must be assigned with non-zero. Doing otherwise
> > > > > > will be break the interfaces functionality which isn't acceptable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_USE_UART1], 1);
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_USE_UART0], 1);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + switch (plat->phy_interface) {
> > > > > > > > > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_USE_TXCLK], 0);
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_USE_PWM23], 0);
> > > > > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > > > > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_USE_TXCLK], 1);
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_USE_PWM23], 1);
> > > > > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > > > > + default:
> > > > > > > > > + dev_err(dwmac->dev, "Unsupported PHY mode %u\n",
> > > > > > > > > + plat->phy_interface);
> > > > > > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC1_SHUT], 0);
> > > > > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > > > > + switch (plat->phy_interface) {
> > > > > > > > > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC0_USE_TXCLK], 0);
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC0_USE_PWM01], 0);
> > > > > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > > > > + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC0_USE_TXCLK], 1);
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC0_USE_PWM01], 1);
> > > > > > > > > + break;
> > > > > > > > > + default:
> > > > > > > > > + dev_err(dwmac->dev, "Unsupported PHY mode %u\n",
> > > > > > > > > + plat->phy_interface);
> > > > > > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC0_SHUT], 0);
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static int ls1c_dwmac_syscon_init(struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
> > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > + struct ls1x_dwmac *dwmac = plat->bsp_priv;
> > > > > > > > > + struct regmap_field **regmap_fields = dwmac->regmap_fields;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + if (plat->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[PHY_INTF_SELI], 0x4);
> > > > > > > > > + } else {
> > > > > > > > > + dev_err(dwmac->dev, "Unsupported PHY-mode %u\n",
> > > > > > > > > + plat->phy_interface);
> > > > > > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + regmap_field_write(regmap_fields[GMAC_SHUT], 0);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static const struct ls1x_dwmac_syscon ls1b_dwmac_syscon = {
> > > > > > > > > + .reg_fields = ls1b_dwmac_syscon_regfields,
> > > > > > > > > + .nr_reg_fields = ARRAY_SIZE(ls1b_dwmac_syscon_regfields),
> > > > > > > > > + .syscon_init = ls1b_dwmac_syscon_init,
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static const struct ls1x_dwmac_syscon ls1c_dwmac_syscon = {
> > > > > > > > > + .reg_fields = ls1c_dwmac_syscon_regfields,
> > > > > > > > > + .nr_reg_fields = ARRAY_SIZE(ls1c_dwmac_syscon_regfields),
> > > > > > > > > + .syscon_init = ls1c_dwmac_syscon_init,
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static int ls1x_dwmac_init(struct platform_device *pdev, void *priv)
> > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > + struct ls1x_dwmac *dwmac = priv;
> > > > > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + ret = devm_regmap_field_bulk_alloc(dwmac->dev, dwmac->regmap,
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->regmap_fields,
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->syscon->reg_fields,
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->syscon->nr_reg_fields);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please see my first comment about this.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + if (dwmac->syscon->syscon_init) {
> > > > > > > > > + ret = dwmac->syscon->syscon_init(dwmac->plat_dat);
> > > > > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id ls1x_dwmac_syscon_match[] = {
> > > > > > > > > + { .compatible = "loongson,ls1b-syscon", .data = &ls1b_dwmac_syscon },
> > > > > > > > > + { .compatible = "loongson,ls1c-syscon", .data = &ls1c_dwmac_syscon },
> > > > > > > > > + { }
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static int ls1x_dwmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > > > > > +{
> > > > > > > > > + struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat_dat;
> > > > > > > > > + struct stmmac_resources stmmac_res;
> > > > > > > > > + struct device_node *syscon_np;
> > > > > > > > > + const struct of_device_id *match;
> > > > > > > > > + struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > > > > > > + struct ls1x_dwmac *dwmac;
> > > > > > > > > + const struct ls1x_dwmac_syscon *syscon;
> > > > > > > > > + size_t size;
> > > > > > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + ret = stmmac_get_platform_resources(pdev, &stmmac_res);
> > > > > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + /* Probe syscon */
> > > > > > > > > + syscon_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "syscon", 0);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > it's vendor-specific property so it is supposed to have a
> > > > > > > > vendor-specific prefix and possibly ls1-specific name.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This has been fixed in v2.
> > > > > > > Could you please review v2?
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + if (!syscon_np)
> > > > > > > > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + match = of_match_node(ls1x_dwmac_syscon_match, syscon_np);
> > > > > > > > > + if (!match) {
> > > > > > > > > + of_node_put(syscon_np);
> > > > > > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > + syscon = (const struct ls1x_dwmac_syscon *)match->data;
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Please note that of_match_node() is used for syscon matching.
> > > >
> > > > I noticed it in the first place. Please see my next comment.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + regmap = syscon_node_to_regmap(syscon_np);
> > > > > > > > > + of_node_put(syscon_np);
> > > > > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) {
> > > > > > > > > + ret = PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > > > > > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to map syscon: %d\n", ret);
> > > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > or you can use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(). Using
> > > > > > > > of_match_node() doesn't seem necessary since it's unlikely to have
> > > > > > > > moee than one system controller available on the LS1b or LS1c chips.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I planned to use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle().
> > > > > > > Thus the compatible
> > > > > > > "loongson,ls1b-dwmac-syscon"/"loongson,ls1c-dwmac-syscon" would become
> > > > > > > useless.
> > > > > > > I'm not sure about this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The compatible strings should be left despite of the
> > > > > > syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() usage. But again "dwmac" suffix is
> > > > > > redundant. Based on the CSRs definition in regs-mux.h, selecting
> > > > > > (G)MAC pins mode is only a small part of the Loongson1 SoC system
> > > > > > controllers functionality.
> > > > > > "loongson,ls1b-syscon"/"loongson,ls1c-syscon" looks more appropriate.
> > > > > >
> > > > > That's what I did in PATCH 2/5.
> > > > > I've just explained this to Krzysztof.
> > > > > And will change back to "loongson,ls1b-syscon"/"loongson,ls1c-syscon"
> > > > > in next version.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > In addition, syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() returns regmap pointer directly.
> > > > > Then, there wil be no way to do syscon matching without its device_node.
> > > > > How will I know whether the syscon is loongson,ls1b-syscon or
> > > > > loongson,ls1c-syscon?
> > > >
> > > > Do you have both of these syscons available in the same SoC? I don't
> > > > think so. Thus you don't need such validation since the LS1C SoC dts
> > > > file will have the "loongson,ls1c-syscon" syscon node defined only and
> > > > the LS1B SoC dts file - "loongson,ls1b-syscon" only.
> > > >
> >
> > > I believe you have noticed the difference of syscon_init() between
> > > LS1B and LS1C.
> > > The syscon matching is for finding the right syscon_init().
> >
> > There are other ways to select syscon_init(). Syscon node compatible
> > string is just one of them. You can do that by one of the next way:
> > 1. Based on the syscon-property name: "loongson,ls1b-syscon" property
> > always points to the LS1B syscon phandle so the
> > ls1b_dwmac_syscon_init() function is supposed to be selected;
> > "loongson,ls1c-syscon" property always points to the LS1C syscon so
> > ls1c_dwmac_syscon_init() is supposed to be utilized.
> > 2. Based on the MAC compatible string. loongson,ls1b-gmac can be found
> > on the LS1B SoC only which is equipped with the ls1b-syscon system
> > controller only so ls1b_dwmac_syscon_init() must be selected. Likewise
> > you can determine the init function on the LS1C SoC.
> >
> OK. I once used the second way for my draft version.
> static const struct of_device_id ls1x_dwmac_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "loongson,ls1b-gmac", .data = &ls1b_dwmac_syscon, },
> { .compatible = "loongson,ls1c-mac" .data = &ls1c_dwmac_syscon,
> },
> { }
> };
> Then, I will change back to this implementation in the next version.
>
> > -Serge(y)
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks for your review!
> > >
> > > > -Serge(y)
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your review!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -Serge(y)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + size = syscon->nr_reg_fields * sizeof(struct regmap_field *);
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dwmac) + size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > > > > > + if (!dwmac)
> > > > > > > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + plat_dat = stmmac_probe_config_dt(pdev, stmmac_res.mac);
> > > > > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(plat_dat)) {
> > > > > > > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dt configuration failed\n");
> > > > > > > > > + return PTR_ERR(plat_dat);
> > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + plat_dat->bsp_priv = dwmac;
> > > > > > > > > + plat_dat->init = ls1x_dwmac_init;
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->plat_dat = plat_dat;
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->syscon = syscon;
> > > > > > > > > + dwmac->regmap = regmap;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + ret = stmmac_pltfr_probe(pdev, plat_dat, &stmmac_res);
> > > > > > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > + goto err_remove_config_dt;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +err_remove_config_dt:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + if (pdev->dev.of_node)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is this conditional statement necessary here?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're right.
> > > > > > > Will remove this condition in next version.
> > > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -Serge
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > + stmmac_remove_config_dt(pdev, plat_dat);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > > > > > +}
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static const struct of_device_id ls1x_dwmac_match[] = {
> > > > > > > > > + { .compatible = "loongson,ls1b-dwmac" },
> > > > > > > > > + { .compatible = "loongson,ls1c-dwmac" },
> > > > > > > > > + { }
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ls1x_dwmac_match);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +static struct platform_driver ls1x_dwmac_driver = {
> > > > > > > > > + .probe = ls1x_dwmac_probe,
> > > > > > > > > + .remove_new = stmmac_pltfr_remove,
> > > > > > > > > + .driver = {
> > > > > > > > > + .name = "loongson1-dwmac",
> > > > > > > > > + .of_match_table = ls1x_dwmac_match,
> > > > > > > > > + },
> > > > > > > > > +};
> > > > > > > > > +module_platform_driver(ls1x_dwmac_driver);
> > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Keguang Zhang <keguang.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>");
> > > > > > > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Loongson1 DWMAC glue layer");
> > > > > > > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > 2.39.2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Keguang Zhang
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Keguang Zhang
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Keguang Zhang
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Keguang Zhang