Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] media: qcom: camss: Fix csid-gen2 for test pattern generator

From: Bryan O'Donoghue
Date: Tue Aug 22 2023 - 15:07:38 EST


On 22/08/2023 17:38, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 22.08.2023 18:16, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
From: Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxxx>

In the current driver csid Test Pattern Generator (TPG) doesn't work.
This change:
- fixes writing frame width and height values into CSID_TPG_DT_n_CFG_0
- fixes the shift by one between test_pattern control value and the
actual pattern.
So that TPG starts working, but with the below limitations:
- only test_pattern=9 works as it should
- test_pattern=8 and test_pattern=7 produce black frame (all zeroes)
- the rest of test_pattern's don't work (yavta doesn't get the data)
- regardless of the CFA pattern set by 'media-ctl -V' the actual pixel
order is always the same (RGGB for any RAW8 or RAW10P format in
4608x2592 resolution).

Tested with:

RAW10P format, VC0:
media-ctl -V '"msm_csid0":0[fmt:SRGGB10/4608x2592 field:none]'
media-ctl -V '"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[fmt:SRGGB10/4608x2592 field:none]'
media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":1->"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[1]'
v4l2-ctl -d /dev/v4l-subdev6 -c test_pattern=9
yavta -B capture-mplane --capture=3 -n 3 -f SRGGB10P -s 4608x2592 /dev/video0

RAW10P format, VC1:
media-ctl -V '"msm_csid0":2[fmt:SRGGB10/4608x2592 field:none]'
media-ctl -V '"msm_vfe0_rdi1":0[fmt:SRGGB10/4608x2592 field:none]'
media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":2->"msm_vfe0_rdi1":0[1]'
v4l2-ctl -d /dev/v4l-subdev6 -c test_pattern=9
yavta -B capture-mplane --capture=3 -n 3 -f SRGGB10P -s 4608x2592 /dev/video1

RAW8 format, VC0:
media-ctl --reset
media-ctl -V '"msm_csid0":0[fmt:SRGGB8/4608x2592 field:none]'
media-ctl -V '"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[fmt:SRGGB8/4608x2592 field:none]'
media-ctl -l '"msm_csid0":1->"msm_vfe0_rdi0":0[1]'
yavta -B capture-mplane --capture=3 -n 3 -f SRGGB8 -s 4608x2592 /dev/video0

Fixes: eebe6d00e9bf ("media: camss: Add support for CSID hardware version Titan 170")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
That's a whole lot to unroll..

[...]
if (tg->enabled) {
- /* Config Test Generator */
- vc = 0xa;
-
Which part does this hunk correlate to?

/* configure one DT, infinite frames */
val = vc << TPG_VC_CFG0_VC_NUM;
val |= INTELEAVING_MODE_ONE_SHOT << TPG_VC_CFG0_LINE_INTERLEAVING_MODE;
@@ -370,14 +367,14 @@ static void __csid_configure_stream(struct csid_device *csid, u8 enable, u8 vc)
writel_relaxed(0x12345678, csid->base + CSID_TPG_LFSR_SEED);
- val = input_format->height & 0x1fff << TPG_DT_n_CFG_0_FRAME_HEIGHT;
- val |= input_format->width & 0x1fff << TPG_DT_n_CFG_0_FRAME_WIDTH;
+ val = (input_format->height & 0x1fff) << TPG_DT_n_CFG_0_FRAME_HEIGHT;
+ val |= (input_format->width & 0x1fff) << TPG_DT_n_CFG_0_FRAME_WIDTH;
writel_relaxed(val, csid->base + CSID_TPG_DT_n_CFG_0(0));
This screams necessity for FIELD_PREP/GET! Could you please convert
it in another series if you have time for it?

I mean yes I want to or want it done. To me 1 << somevalue is just silly when you can say BIT(somevalue).

There will be a "make it pretty series".

I'll do a V2 of this series and explain in the commit log what's happening with the removal of vc = 0xa; since if someone has to ask, its not obvious whats going on.

---
bod