On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:20 AM Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 5:13 PM Yu Kuai <yukuai1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
There are no functional changes, just to make the code simpler and
prepare to delay remove_and_add_spares() to md_start_sync().
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/md.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index ceace5ffadd6..11d27c934fdd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/md.c
+++ b/drivers/md/md.c
@@ -9169,6 +9169,14 @@ static bool rdev_removeable(struct md_rdev *rdev)
return true;
}
+static bool rdev_is_spare(struct md_rdev *rdev)
+{
+ return !test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags) && rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
+ !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
+ !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
+ !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags);
+}
+
static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
struct md_rdev *this)
{
@@ -9217,13 +9225,10 @@ static int remove_and_add_spares(struct mddev *mddev,
rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
if (this && this != rdev)
continue;
+ if (rdev_is_spare(rdev))
+ spares++;
if (test_bit(Candidate, &rdev->flags))
continue;
Hi Kuai
Why not put rdev_is_spare after testing Candidate?
Best Regards
Xiao
I know the answer now, Because the next patch wants to put codes into
the function rdev_addable
- if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0 &&
- !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags) &&
- !test_bit(Journal, &rdev->flags) &&
- !test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
- spares++;
if (rdev->raid_disk >= 0)
continue;
if (test_bit(Faulty, &rdev->flags))
--
2.39.2
Reviewed-by: Xiao Ni <xni@xxxxxxxxxx>
.