Re: [PATCH] fs: btrfs: fix possible use-after-free bug in error handling code of btrfs_get_root_ref()
From: Lee Jones
Date: Wed Aug 23 2023 - 04:01:04 EST
On Fri, 01 Apr 2022, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 04:04:17PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> > >> @@ -1850,9 +1850,10 @@ static struct btrfs_root *btrfs_get_root_ref(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> > >>
> > >> ret = btrfs_insert_fs_root(fs_info, root);
> > >> if (ret) {
> > >> - btrfs_put_root(root);
> > >> - if (ret == -EEXIST)
> > >> + if (ret == -EEXIST) {
> > >> + btrfs_put_root(root);
> > > I think this fix is correct, though it's not that clear. If you look how
> > > the code changed, there was the unconditional put and then followed by a
> > > free:
> > >
> > > 8c38938c7bb0 ("btrfs: move the root freeing stuff into btrfs_put_root")
> > >
> > > Here it's putting twice where one will be the final free.
> > >
> > > And then the whole refcounting gets updated in
> > >
> > > 4785e24fa5d2 ("btrfs: don't take an extra root ref at allocation time")
> > >
> > > which could be removing the wrong put, I'm not yet sure.
> >
> > Thanks for the reply!
> >
> > I think the bug should be introduced by this commit:
> > bc44d7c4b2b1 ("btrfs: push btrfs_grab_fs_root into btrfs_get_fs_root")
> >
> > This commit has a change:
> > ret = btrfs_insert_fs_root(fs_info, root);
> > if (ret) {
> > + btrfs_put_fs_root(root);
> > if (ret == -EEXIST) {
> > btrfs_free_fs_root(root);
> > goto again;
> > }
> >
> > I could add a Fixes tag of this commit in my V2 patch.
> > Is it okay?
>
> I can add it myself, that's a minor thing. The fix is correct, I've
> rewritten the changelog a bit, patch now added to misc-next, thanks.
Where is 'misc-next' please?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]