Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] selftests/sgx: Specify freestanding environment for enclave compilation

[Jo Van Bulck]

On 22.08.23 12:14, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Do you still need nostdfiles and nostartfiles with freestanding?

Thanks, good question. I tested that compiling with only -ffreestanding 
yields:

/* snipped */
/usr/local/bin/ld: 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/9/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/rcrt1.o: in 
function `_start':
(.text+0x24): undefined reference to `main'
/* snipped */

So we definitely still need -nostartfiles to prevent the compiler/linker 
from introducing the standard system startup functions. However, in my 
understanding, -nostdlib (which is what I assume you mean with 
nostdfiles) already implies the individual options -nodefaultlibs and 
-nostartfiles.

Thus, we definitely still need -nostartfiles and I'm not 100% sure we 
don't need -nostdlib (though it compiles fine for me with only 
-nostartfiles). Gcc only specifies:

-ffreestanding
Assert that compilation targets a freestanding environment.  This 
implies -fno-builtin. A freestanding environment is one in which the 
standard library may not exist, and program startup may not necessarily 
be at "main".

Bottom line: I suggest to keep -nostdlib to be sure and remove 
-nostartfiles (as it is redundant). I'll include this in the next  patch 
iteration.

Best,
Jo