Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add sku_id and board id for lazor/limozeen
From: Doug Anderson
Date: Wed Aug 23 2023 - 09:33:29 EST
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 12:13 AM Sheng-Liang Pan
<sheng-liang.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> SKU ID 10: Lazor LTE+Wifi, no-esim (Strapped 0 X 0)
> SKU ID 15: Limozeen LTE+Wifi, TS, no esim (Strapped 1 X 0)
> SKU ID 18: Limozeen LTE+Wifi, no TS, no esim (Strapped X 0 0)
>
> Even though the "no esim" boards are strapped differently than
> ones that have an esim, the esim isn't represented in the
> device tree so the same device tree can be used for LTE w/ esim
> and LTE w/out esim.
>
> add BRD_ID(0, Z, 0) = 10 for new board with ALC5682i-VS
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng-Liang Pan <sheng-liang.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch base on patch[1] which move trogdor rt5682s bits to a fragment.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230816112143.1.I7227efd47e0dc42b6ff243bd22aa1a3e01923220@changeid/
>
> Changes in v6:
> - commit update, add dependent patch link
> - remove unnecessary symbol
> - sort out the order of properties
>
> Changes in v5:
> - include rt5682s node for new board version 10
>
> Changes in v4:
> - combine pathc2 and patch3
>
> Changes in v3:
> - sort out the node order alphabetically
>
> Changes in v2:
> - add new entry rev9 with Parade bridge chip
> - correct newly create dts files
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 5 +++
> ...sc7180-trogdor-lazor-limozeen-nots-r10.dts | 29 ++++++++++++
> .../sc7180-trogdor-lazor-limozeen-nots-r9.dts | 6 +--
> .../sc7180-trogdor-lazor-limozeen-r10.dts | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-limozeen-r9.dts | 10 ++---
> .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r10-kb.dts | 23 ++++++++++
> .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r10-lte.dts | 27 +++++++++++
> .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r10.dts | 19 ++++++++
> .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r9-kb.dts | 4 +-
> .../dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r9-lte.dts | 4 +-
> .../boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor-r9.dts | 4 +-
> 11 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
It would have been fine to keep my Reviewed-by with just the minor
changes that Konrad requested, but giving it again anyway:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>