Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: lmk04832: Don't disable vco clock on probe fail

From: Liam Beguin
Date: Wed Aug 23 2023 - 15:15:10 EST


On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Mike Looijmans wrote:
> The probe() method never calls clk_prepare_enable(), so it should not
> call clk_disable_unprepare() for the vco.clk in the error path. Fixes
> a "lmk-vco already disabled" BUG when probe fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c b/drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c
> index 188085e7a30b..dd1f0c59ee71 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-lmk04832.c
> @@ -1505,21 +1505,21 @@ static int lmk04832_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> ret = clk_set_rate(lmk->vco.clk, lmk->vco_rate);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(lmk->dev, "failed to set VCO rate\n");
> - goto err_disable_vco;
> + goto err_disable_oscin;
> }
> }
>
> ret = lmk04832_register_sclk(lmk);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(lmk->dev, "failed to init SYNC/SYSREF clock path\n");
> - goto err_disable_vco;
> + goto err_disable_oscin;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < info->num_channels; i++) {
> ret = lmk04832_register_clkout(lmk, i);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(lmk->dev, "failed to register clk %d\n", i);
> - goto err_disable_vco;
> + goto err_disable_oscin;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1528,16 +1528,13 @@ static int lmk04832_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> lmk->clk_data);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(lmk->dev, "failed to add provider (%d)\n", ret);
> - goto err_disable_vco;
> + goto err_disable_oscin;
> }
>
> spi_set_drvdata(spi, lmk);
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_disable_vco:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(lmk->vco.clk);
> -
> err_disable_oscin:
> clk_disable_unprepare(lmk->oscin);
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> Met vriendelijke groet / kind regards,
>
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
>
>
> TOPIC Embedded Products B.V.
> Materiaalweg 4, 5681 RJ Best
> The Netherlands
>
> T: +31 (0) 499 33 69 69
> E: mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> W: www.topic.nl
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail