Re: [PATCH v2] modpost: Skip .llvm.call-graph-profile section check

[Masahiro Yamada]

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:30 AM Denis Nikitin <denik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 4:02 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:00 AM Fangrui Song <maskray@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 10:49 AM Denis Nikitin <denik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > .llvm.call-graph-profile section is added by clang when the kernel is
> > > > built with profiles (e.g. -fprofile-sample-use= or -fprofile-use=).
> > > >
> > > > The section contains edge information derived from text sections,
> > > > so .llvm.call-graph-profile itself doesn't need more analysis as
> > > > the text sections have been analyzed.
> > > >
> > > > This change fixes the kernel build with clang and a sample profile
> > > > which currently fails with:
> > > >
> > > > "FATAL: modpost: Please add code to calculate addend for this architecture"
> >
> >
> > Curious.
> >
> > This message is only displayed for REL.
> >
> > (Please not it is located in section_rel() function)
> >
> >
> > I think modern architectures use RELA instead of REL.
> > Which architecture are we talking about?
>
> Aarch64. There was also a report on x86-64 but the error message could be
> different there.
>
> >
> >
> > What does the output of this command look like?
> >
> > $ llvm-readelf -S vmlinux.o | grep  .llvm.call-graph-profile
> >
> >
> > Is it REL?
> >
>
>   [119] .llvm.call-graph-profile LLVM_CALL_GRAPH_PROFILE 0000000000000000
> 1c74a458 0104c8 08   E  0   0  1
>   [120] .rel.llvm.call-graph-profile REL 0000000000000000 1c75a920 041320 10
> I 26090 119  8


Fangrui,

Aarch64 uses RELA for other sections, but REL for this one.

I'd like to confirm if this is an expectation, not a toolchain bug.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada