Re: [PATCH v2 06/18] perf s390 s390_cpumcfdg_dump: Don't scan all PMUs

[Ian Rogers]

On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:20 AM Thomas Richter <tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 8/24/23 15:59, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 09:13:18PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> >> Rather than scanning all PMUs for a counter name, scan the PMU
> >> associated with the evsel of the sample. This is done to remove a
> >> dependence on pmu-events.h.
> >
> > I'm applying this one, and CCing the S/390 developers so that they can
> > try this and maybe provide an Acked-by/Tested-by,
> >
> > - Arnaldo
>
>
> Arnaldo,
>
> I have downloaded this patch set of 18 patches (using b4), but they do not
> apply on my git tree.
>
> Which git branch do I have to use to test this. Thanks a lot.

Hi Thomas,

the changes are in the perf-tools-next tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/

Thanks,
Ian

> --
> Thomas Richter, Dept 3303, IBM s390 Linux Development, Boeblingen, Germany
> --
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen
> Geschäftsführung: David Faller
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
>