Re: [PATCH 11/33] iris: vidc: add helpers for memory management

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 14.08.2023 21:06, Dikshita Agarwal wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/28/2023 10:52 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 28.07.2023 18:28, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:53:22PM +0530, Vikash Garodia wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/vidc/src/msm_vidc_memory.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/iris/vidc/src/msm_vidc_memory.c
>>> [..]
>>>> +static const struct msm_vidc_memory_ops msm_mem_ops = {
>>>> +	.dma_buf_get                    = msm_vidc_dma_buf_get,
>>>> +	.dma_buf_put                    = msm_vidc_dma_buf_put,
>>>> +	.dma_buf_put_completely         = msm_vidc_dma_buf_put_completely,
>>>> +	.dma_buf_attach                 = msm_vidc_dma_buf_attach,
>>>> +	.dma_buf_detach                 = msm_vidc_dma_buf_detach,
>>>> +	.dma_buf_map_attachment         = msm_vidc_dma_buf_map_attachment,
>>>> +	.dma_buf_unmap_attachment       = msm_vidc_dma_buf_unmap_attachment,
>>>> +	.memory_alloc_map               = msm_vidc_memory_alloc_map,
>>>> +	.memory_unmap_free              = msm_vidc_memory_unmap_free,
>>>> +	.buffer_region                  = msm_vidc_buffer_region,
>>>
>>> Will there ever be more than one implementation of the
>>> msm_vidc_memory_ops?
>>>
>>> Unless there's a really strong reason, just call the functions directly
>>> without the function pointers and call_mem_op(), this will be slightly
>>> faster, but more importantly it allows for much faster navigation of the
>>> code base.
>> Same for HFI ops
> Hi Konrad,
> There are no HFI ops in this driver, are you referring to anything else
> here, could you please point me to it?
Sorry, I had that in my brain cache after reading through the downstream
driver..

Konrad