Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] irqchip/gic-v3: Enable support for SGIs to act as NMIs

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Sat, Aug 26, 2023 at 3:37 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:30:27 +0100,
> Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As of commit 6abbd6988971 ("irqchip/gic, gic-v3: Make SGIs use
> > handle_percpu_devid_irq()") SGIs are treated the same as PPIs/EPPIs
> > and use handle_percpu_devid_irq() by default. Unfortunately,
> > handle_percpu_devid_irq() isn't NMI safe, and so to run in an NMI
> > context those should use handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi().
> >
> > In order to accomplish this, we just have to make room for SGIs in the
> > array of refcounts that keeps track of which interrupts are set as
> > NMI. We also rename the array and create a new indexing scheme that
> > accounts for SGIs.
> >
> > Also, enable NMI support prior to gic_smp_init() as allocation of SGIs
> > as IRQs/NMIs happen as part of this routine.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > In v10 I removed the previous Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags since the
> > patch contents changed pretty drastically.
> >
> > I'll also note that this change is a little more black magic to me
> > than others in this series. I don't have a massive amounts of
> > familiarity with all the moving parts of gic-v3, so I mostly just
> > followed Mark Rutland's advice [1]. Please pay extra attention to make
> > sure I didn't do anything too terrible.
> >
> > Mark's advice wasn't a full patch and I ended up doing a bit of work
> > to translate it to reality, so I did not add him as "Co-developed-by"
> > here. Mark: if you would like this tag then please provide it and your
> > Signed-off-by. I certainly won't object.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZNC-YRQopO0PaIIo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > (no changes since v10)
> >
> > Changes in v10:
> > - Rewrite as needed for 5.11+ as per Mark Rutland and Sumit.
> >
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> > index eedfa8e9f077..49d18cf3f636 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
> > @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
> >  #define GIC_LINE_NR  min(GICD_TYPER_SPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer), 1020U)
> >  #define GIC_ESPI_NR  GICD_TYPER_ESPIS(gic_data.rdists.gicd_typer)
> >
> > +#define SGI_NR               16
>
> Why 16? We only allocate 8, as the other 8 are potentially stolen by
> the secure side. We do try and initialise them all so that they have a
> known state if they were actually configured as Group-1NS, but we
> don't use them.
>
> I understand that this simplifies the indexing in the rdist_nmi_refs
> array and I'm not going to cry over 32 wasted bytes, but this
> definitely deserves a comment.

Good point. I'll plan to wait another day or two to see if any other
feedback shows up and then send a v12 with this plus Stephen's nit
fixes on one of the other patches.

-Doug