Re: [PATCH] Add support for more XMC series

[Michael Walle]

Am 2023-08-29 06:56, schrieb SSunk:
> > Hi Michael,
> > Since this is the first time I've submitted code to the Linux 
> > community, please forgive me for some of the missteps that I've made.
> > I uploaded the incorrect patch file.
> > In a previous e-mail you said：
> > XMC parts seem to have SFDP tables and they should work out of the box
> > without any patches with the generic spi nor driver [1]. Therefore,
> > you don't need any entry at all.
> >
> > I think it is related to the PARSE_SFDP flag.
> > The XMC flash part supports SFDP, so i don’t need to add 
> > NO_SFDP_FLAGS() macro.
> > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c
> > index 051411e86339..e78bf11792d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/xmc.c
> > @@ -11,11 +11,20 @@
> > static const struct flash_info xmc_nor_parts[] = {
> > 	/* XMC (Wuhan Xinxin Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp.) */
> > 	{ "XM25QH64A", INFO(0x207017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128)
> > -		NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> > -			      SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > 	{ "XM25QH128A", INFO(0x207018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256)
> > -		NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
> > -			      SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ) },
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > +	{ "XM25QH128C", INFO(0x204018, 0, 64 * 1024, 256)
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > +	{ "XM25QH256C", INFO(0x204019, 0, 64 * 1024, 512)
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > +	{ "XM25QU256C", INFO(0x204119, 0, 64 * 1024, 512)
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > +	{ "XM25QH512C", INFO(0x204020, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024)
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > +	{ "XM25QU512C", INFO(0x204120, 0, 64 * 1024, 1024)
> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
> > +
> > };
> >
> > const struct spi_nor_manufacturer spi_nor_xmc = {
> > > Correct. If the flash is working with PARSE_SFDP, it has SFDP and
> > > all the information of the flash_info table is pulled from the SFDP
> > > tables, except for the part name. Therefore, you don't need any entry
> > > at all. The flash should just work out of the box. Are you using the
> > > latest kernel?
> > >
> > > -michael
> --
> Hi Michael,
>
> According to you, does this piece of my code still need to be modified?

You don't need it at all. The flash will work as is - that is without 
that
piece of code.

-michael