Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: corrections to egpu safety check
From: Ilpo Järvinen
Date: Wed Aug 30 2023 - 14:56:17 EST
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, Luke D. Jones wrote:
> An incorrect if statement was preventing the enablement of the egpu.
>
> Fixes: d49f4d1a30ac ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: don't allow eGPU switching if eGPU not connected")
>
> Signed-off-by: Luke D. Jones <luke@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please don't leave extra spaces into tags block.
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 15 +++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> index 9783893d2d6e..f54178d6f780 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> @@ -726,19 +726,18 @@ static ssize_t egpu_enable_store(struct device *dev,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> err = asus_wmi_get_devstate_simple(asus, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_EGPU_CONNECTED);
> - if (err < 0)
> - return err;
> - if (err < 1) {
> - err = -ENODEV;
> - pr_warn("Failed to set egpu disable: %d\n", err);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to get egpu connection status: %d\n", err);
So this is the Fixes: part? You should make own patch out of it.
> return err;
> }
>
> if (asus->gpu_mux_mode_available) {
> result = asus_wmi_get_devstate_simple(asus, ASUS_WMI_DEVID_GPU_MUX);
> - if (result < 0)
> + if (result < 0) {
> /* An error here may signal greater failure of GPU handling */
> + pr_warn("Failed to get gpu mux status: %d\n", err);
> return result;
> + }
> if (!result && enable) {
> err = -ENODEV;
> pr_warn("Can not enable eGPU when the MUX is in dGPU mode: %d\n", err);
> @@ -748,12 +747,12 @@ static ssize_t egpu_enable_store(struct device *dev,
>
> err = asus_wmi_set_devstate(ASUS_WMI_DEVID_EGPU, enable, &result);
> if (err) {
> - pr_warn("Failed to set egpu disable: %d\n", err);
> + pr_warn("Failed to set egpu state: %d\n", err);
> return err;
> }
>
> if (result > 1) {
> - pr_warn("Failed to set egpu disable (retval): 0x%x\n", result);
> + pr_warn("Failed to set egpu state (retval): 0x%x\n", result);
> return -EIO;
> }
>
>
These others are good changes too but just not to be made in the same
patch.
--
i.