Re: [PATCH 3/9] phy: qcom: uniphy: Update UNIPHY driver to be a common driver
From: Praveenkumar I
Date: Thu Aug 31 2023 - 08:07:26 EST
On 8/29/2023 8:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 17:00, Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch updates the UNIPHY driver to be a common driver to
accommodate all UNIPHY / Combo PHY. This driver can be used for
both USB and PCIe UNIPHY. Using phy-mul-sel from DTS MUX selection
for USB / PCIe can be acheived.
I'm not sure why you are talking about PCIe here. This patch adds only
SS PHY support.
Also, I'd like to point out that we had this 'USB and PCIe and
everything else' design in the QMP driver. We had to split the driver
into individual pieces to make it manageable again.
This Uniphy 22ull is a combo PHY used between USB GEN3 or PCIe GEN3. Via
mux selection
the one of the controller interface can use it. Hence thought to have a
same PHY driver for
both USB3 and PCIe. Will drop the plan of adding the PCIe support.
Signed-off-by: Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c | 401 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 335 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c
index da6f290af722..eb71588f5417 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-uniphy.c
@@ -5,141 +5,410 @@
* Based on code from
* Allwinner Technology Co., Ltd. <www.allwinnertech.com>
*
+ * Modified the driver to be common for Qualcomm UNIPHYs
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
I'd not call this 'modified', but rather 'rewritten from scratch.
Sure, will correct.
*/
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <linux/reset.h>
-struct ipq4019_usb_phy {
+struct uniphy_init_tbl {
+ unsigned int offset;
+ unsigned int val;
+};
unused
+
+#define UNIPHY_INIT_CFG(o, v) \
+ { \
+ .offset = o, \
+ .val = v, \
+ }
unused
+
+struct uniphy_cfg {
+ const struct uniphy_init_tbl *init_seq;
+ int num_init_seq;
+ const char * const *clk_list;
+ int num_clks;
+ const char * const *reset_list;
+ int num_resets;
+ const char * const *vreg_list;
+ int num_vregs;
+ unsigned int pipe_clk_rate;
+ unsigned int reset_udelay;
+ unsigned int autoload_udelay;
+};
+
+struct qcom_uniphy {
struct device *dev;
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg;
struct phy *phy;
void __iomem *base;
- struct reset_control *por_rst;
- struct reset_control *srif_rst;
+ struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
+ struct reset_control_bulk_data *resets;
+ struct regulator_bulk_data *vregs;
+ struct clk_fixed_rate pipe_clk_fixed;
+};
+
+static const char * const ipq4019_ssphy_reset_l[] = {
+ "por_rst",
+};
+
+static const struct uniphy_cfg ipq4019_usb_ssphy_cfg = {
+ .reset_list = ipq4019_ssphy_reset_l,
+ .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(ipq4019_ssphy_reset_l),
+ .reset_udelay = 10000,
+
};
-static int ipq4019_ss_phy_power_off(struct phy *_phy)
+static const char * const ipq4019_hsphy_reset_l[] = {
+ "por_rst", "srif_rst",
+};
+
+static const struct uniphy_cfg ipq4019_usb_hsphy_cfg = {
+ .reset_list = ipq4019_hsphy_reset_l,
+ .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(ipq4019_hsphy_reset_l),
+ .reset_udelay = 10000,
+};
+
+static int phy_mux_sel(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+ struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
+ struct regmap *tcsr;
+ unsigned int args[2];
+ int ret;
+
+ tcsr = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle_args(dev->of_node, "qcom,phy-mux-sel",
+ ARRAY_SIZE(args), args);
No. mux data should come from match_data rather than polluting DT with it.
+ if (IS_ERR(tcsr)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(tcsr);
+ if (ret == -ENOENT)
+ return 0;
+
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to lookup syscon for phy mux %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* PHY MUX registers only have this BIT0 */
huh?
+ ret = regmap_write(tcsr, args[0], args[1]);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "PHY Mux selection failed: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int uniphy_enable(struct phy *phy)
{
- struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
+ struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
+ const struct uniphy_init_tbl *tbl;
+ void __iomem *base = uniphy->base;
+ int i, ret;
- reset_control_assert(phy->por_rst);
- msleep(10);
+ ret = regulator_bulk_enable(cfg->num_vregs, uniphy->vregs);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(uniphy->dev, "failed to enable regulators: %d\n", ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /* Assert all available resets */
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
+ ret = reset_control_assert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(uniphy->dev, "reset assert failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_assert_reset;
+ }
+ if (cfg->reset_udelay)
+ usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
+ }
There is a whole reset_control_bulk_*() set of API. Please use it
instead of hardcoding reset cycles.
+
+ /* Deassert all available resets */
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
+ ret = reset_control_deassert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(uniphy->dev, "reset deassert failed: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_assert_reset;
+ }
+ if (cfg->reset_udelay)
+ usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
+ }
+
+ ret = phy_mux_sel(phy);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto err_assert_reset;
+
+ ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cfg->num_clks, uniphy->clks);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(uniphy->dev, "failed to enable clocks: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_assert_reset;
+ }
+
+ if (cfg->autoload_udelay)
+ usleep_range(cfg->autoload_udelay, cfg->autoload_udelay + 10);
+
+ if (cfg->num_init_seq) {
+ tbl = cfg->init_seq;
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_init_seq; i++, tbl++)
+ writel(tbl->val, base + tbl->offset);
+ }
unused
return 0;
+
+err_assert_reset:
+ /* Assert all available resets */
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
+ reset_control_assert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
+ if (cfg->reset_udelay)
+ usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
+ }
+
+ return ret;
}
-static int ipq4019_ss_phy_power_on(struct phy *_phy)
+static int uniphy_disable(struct phy *phy)
{
- struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
+ struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
+ int i;
- ipq4019_ss_phy_power_off(_phy);
+ /* Assert all available resets */
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++) {
+ reset_control_assert(uniphy->resets[i].rstc);
+ if (cfg->reset_udelay)
+ usleep_range(cfg->reset_udelay, cfg->reset_udelay + 10);
+ }
- reset_control_deassert(phy->por_rst);
+ clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cfg->num_clks, uniphy->clks);
+
+ regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, uniphy->vregs);
return 0;
}
-static const struct phy_ops ipq4019_usb_ss_phy_ops = {
- .power_on = ipq4019_ss_phy_power_on,
- .power_off = ipq4019_ss_phy_power_off,
+static const struct phy_ops uniphy_phy_ops = {
+ .power_on = uniphy_enable,
+ .power_off = uniphy_disable,
Using _enable / _disable for power_on() and power_off() isn't logical.
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
-static int ipq4019_hs_phy_power_off(struct phy *_phy)
+static int qcom_uniphy_vreg_init(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy)
+{
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
+ struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ uniphy->vregs = devm_kcalloc(dev, cfg->num_vregs,
+ sizeof(*uniphy->vregs), GFP_KERNEL);
You know the maximum amount of regulators. Can you use an array
instead of allocating data?
+ if (!uniphy->vregs)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_vregs; i++)
+ uniphy->vregs[i].supply = cfg->vreg_list[i];
+
+ ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev, cfg->num_vregs, uniphy->vregs);
+
Drop empty lines between ret assignment and check.
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get regulators\n");
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_uniphy_reset_init(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy)
{
- struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
+ struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
+ int i, ret;
+
+ uniphy->resets = devm_kcalloc(dev, cfg->num_resets,
+ sizeof(*uniphy->resets), GFP_KERNEL);
Same here, can you use an array?
+ if (!uniphy->resets)
+ return -ENOMEM;
- reset_control_assert(phy->por_rst);
- msleep(10);
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_resets; i++)
+ uniphy->resets[i].id = cfg->reset_list[i];
Declare common resets list and use
devm_reset_control_bulk_get_optional_exclusive().
- reset_control_assert(phy->srif_rst);
- msleep(10);
+ ret = devm_reset_control_bulk_get_exclusive(dev, cfg->num_resets, uniphy->resets);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get resets\n");
return 0;
}
-static int ipq4019_hs_phy_power_on(struct phy *_phy)
+static int qcom_uniphy_clk_init(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy)
I don't see clocks actually being used. Please do not introduce unused features.
{
- struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy = phy_get_drvdata(_phy);
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
+ struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
+ int i, ret;
- ipq4019_hs_phy_power_off(_phy);
- reset_control_deassert(phy->srif_rst);
- msleep(10);
+ uniphy->clks = devm_kcalloc(dev, cfg->num_clks,
+ sizeof(*uniphy->clks), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!uniphy->clks)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cfg->num_clks; i++)
+ uniphy->clks[i].id = cfg->clk_list[i];
- reset_control_deassert(phy->por_rst);
+ ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, cfg->num_clks, uniphy->clks);
+ if (ret)
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get clocks\n");
return 0;
}
-static const struct phy_ops ipq4019_usb_hs_phy_ops = {
- .power_on = ipq4019_hs_phy_power_on,
- .power_off = ipq4019_hs_phy_power_off,
-};
+static void phy_clk_release_provider(void *res)
+{
+ of_clk_del_provider(res);
+}
-static const struct of_device_id ipq4019_usb_phy_of_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_hs_phy_ops},
- { .compatible = "qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_ss_phy_ops},
- { },
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ipq4019_usb_phy_of_match);
+/*
+ * Register a fixed rate pipe clock.
+ *
+ * The <s>_pipe_clksrc generated by PHY goes to the GCC that gate
+ * controls it. The <s>_pipe_clk coming out of the GCC is requested
+ * by the PHY driver for its operations.
+ * We register the <s>_pipe_clksrc here. The gcc driver takes care
+ * of assigning this <s>_pipe_clksrc as parent to <s>_pipe_clk.
+ * Below picture shows this relationship.
+ *
+ * +---------------+
+ * | PHY block |<<---------------------------------------+
+ * | | |
+ * | +-------+ | +-----+ |
+ * I/P---^-->| PLL |---^--->pipe_clksrc--->| GCC |--->pipe_clk---+
+ * clk | +-------+ | +-----+
+ * +---------------+
+ */
+static int phy_pipe_clk_register(struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy, struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct clk_fixed_rate *fixed = &uniphy->pipe_clk_fixed;
+ const struct uniphy_cfg *cfg = uniphy->cfg;
+ struct device *dev = uniphy->dev;
+ struct clk_init_data init = { };
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = of_property_read_string(np, "clock-output-names", &init.name);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(dev, "%pOFn: No clock-output-names\n", np);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ init.ops = &clk_fixed_rate_ops;
+
+ fixed->fixed_rate = cfg->pipe_clk_rate;
+ fixed->hw.init = &init;
-static int ipq4019_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+ ret = devm_clk_hw_register(dev, &fixed->hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, of_clk_hw_simple_get, &fixed->hw);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
When you c&p something, please take care to understand the code you are copying.
Unlike QMP drivers you can (and should) use devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider() here.
Not to mention that pipe clocks are not in this patch.
+
+ /*
+ * Roll a devm action because the clock provider is the child node, but
+ * the child node is not actually a device.
+ */
+ return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, phy_clk_release_provider, np);
+}
+
+static int qcom_uniphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
- struct ipq4019_usb_phy *phy;
+ struct qcom_uniphy *uniphy;
+ struct device_node *np;
+ int ret;
- phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*phy), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!phy)
+ uniphy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*uniphy), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!uniphy)
return -ENOMEM;
- phy->dev = &pdev->dev;
- phy->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(phy->base)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to remap register memory\n");
- return PTR_ERR(phy->base);
- }
+ uniphy->dev = dev;
- phy->por_rst = devm_reset_control_get(phy->dev, "por_rst");
- if (IS_ERR(phy->por_rst)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(phy->por_rst) != -EPROBE_DEFER)
- dev_err(dev, "POR reset is missing\n");
- return PTR_ERR(phy->por_rst);
+ uniphy->cfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!uniphy->cfg)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ uniphy->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+ if (IS_ERR(uniphy->base)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(uniphy->base);
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to remap register memory\n");
+ return ret;
}
- phy->srif_rst = devm_reset_control_get_optional(phy->dev, "srif_rst");
- if (IS_ERR(phy->srif_rst))
- return PTR_ERR(phy->srif_rst);
+ ret = qcom_uniphy_clk_init(uniphy);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = qcom_uniphy_reset_init(uniphy);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = qcom_uniphy_vreg_init(uniphy);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (uniphy->cfg->pipe_clk_rate) {
+ np = of_node_get(dev->of_node);
What for? Do you think that the driver can outlive struct device?
+ ret = phy_pipe_clk_register(uniphy, np);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to register pipe clk\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+ }
- phy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, of_device_get_match_data(dev));
- if (IS_ERR(phy->phy)) {
- dev_err(dev, "failed to create PHY\n");
- return PTR_ERR(phy->phy);
+ uniphy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &uniphy_phy_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(uniphy->phy)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(uniphy->phy);
+ dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to create PHY\n");
+ goto err;
}
- phy_set_drvdata(phy->phy, phy);
+
+ phy_set_drvdata(uniphy->phy, uniphy);
phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
- return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
+ ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider);
+
+err:
+ if (uniphy->cfg->pipe_clk_rate)
+ of_node_put(np);
+ return ret;
}
-static struct platform_driver ipq4019_usb_phy_driver = {
- .probe = ipq4019_usb_phy_probe,
+static const struct of_device_id qcom_uniphy_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,usb-hs-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_hsphy_cfg},
+ { .compatible = "qcom,usb-ss-ipq4019-phy", .data = &ipq4019_usb_ssphy_cfg},
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_uniphy_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver qcom_uniphy_driver = {
+ .probe = qcom_uniphy_probe,
.driver = {
- .of_match_table = ipq4019_usb_phy_of_match,
- .name = "ipq4019-usb-phy",
+ .of_match_table = qcom_uniphy_of_match,
+ .name = "qcom-uniphy",
}
};
-module_platform_driver(ipq4019_usb_phy_driver);
+module_platform_driver(qcom_uniphy_driver);
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM/IPQ4019 USB phy driver");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("QCOM uniphy driver");
MODULE_AUTHOR("John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
General comment: please consider dropping this beast and starting from
scratch, adding only really necessary bits to the existing ipq4019 USB
PHY driver.
Rewritten the entire driver considering the IPQ5332 as well and because
of it
there are unused code which are utilized in patch [8/9]. I should have
added only the IPQ4019
support alone in this patch and then incrementally update it for
IPQ5332. Will follow that here
onwards. Will address all the review comments.
- Praveenkumar