Re: linux-next: manual merge of the risc-v tree with Linus' tree
From: Nick Desaulniers
Date: Thu Aug 31 2023 - 13:50:30 EST
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 4:29 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the risc-v tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
>
> between commit:
>
> d2402048bc8a ("riscv: mm: fix 2 instances of -Wmissing-variable-declarations")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 56e1803d9de0 ("riscv: Mark KASAN tmp* page tables variables as static")
>
> from the risc-v tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Fix LGTM; I guess Palmer you may need to rebase that branch on mainline?
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
> index a01bc15dce24,435e94a5b1bb..000000000000
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c
> @@@ -22,9 -22,10 +22,9 @@@
> * region is not and then we have to go down to the PUD level.
> */
>
> - pgd_t tmp_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD] __page_aligned_bss;
> - p4d_t tmp_p4d[PTRS_PER_P4D] __page_aligned_bss;
> - pud_t tmp_pud[PTRS_PER_PUD] __page_aligned_bss;
> -extern pgd_t early_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD];
> + static pgd_t tmp_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD] __page_aligned_bss;
> + static p4d_t tmp_p4d[PTRS_PER_P4D] __page_aligned_bss;
> + static pud_t tmp_pud[PTRS_PER_PUD] __page_aligned_bss;
>
> static void __init kasan_populate_pte(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long end)
> {
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers