Re: [PATCH 2/2] Ensure num_actions is not a negative

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Date: Fri Sep 01 2023 - 04:58:55 EST


On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 06:04:37PM -0700, joao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> In nft_flow_rule_create function, num_actions is a signed integer. Yet,
> it is processed within a loop which increments its value. To prevent an
> overflow from occurring, check if num_actions is not only equal to 0,
> but also not negative.
>
> After checking with maintainers, it was mentioned that front-end will
> cap the num_actions vlaue and that it is not possible to reach such
> condition for an overflow. Yet, for correctness, it is still better to
> fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joao Moreira <joao.moreira@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> index 12ab78fa5d84..20dbc95de895 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_offload.c
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct nft_flow_rule *nft_flow_rule_create(struct net *net,
> expr = nft_expr_next(expr);
> }
>
> - if (num_actions == 0)
> + if (num_actions <= 0)
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);

Better turn num_actions into unsigned int I'd suggest.

Next hypothetical problem would be an overflow in the number of
actions, you could check for UINT_MAX if you like here to report
ENOMEM.

Thanks.

> flow = nft_flow_rule_alloc(num_actions);
> --
> 2.41.0
>