Re: [PATCH] jfs: fix array-index-out-of-bounds in dbFindLeaf

From: Dave Kleikamp
Date: Fri Sep 01 2023 - 13:08:51 EST


On 8/31/23 10:19AM, Manas Ghandat wrote:
I was wondering if we could implement a get_tree_size macro wherein  we could find the tree size so that we can do the comparison. SInce the tp->dmt_stree is an array we can get its size and fix the out of bounds. Would this thing work?

dmtree_t is a union of two nearly identical structures that both contain an stree. The only real difference in the structures is the size of the stree, so dbFindLeaf doesn't really know which is being used by the caller.


On 30/08/23 00:08, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
This won't work. dbFindLeaf() can be called from dbFindCtl() with struct dmapctl whose stree index can be as high as CTLTREESIZE which is larger than TREESIZE. A check against CTLTREESIZE might be better than nothing at all but won't necessarily detect an overflow. Currently, dbFindLeaf doesn't have anything to tell it which tree it is working on.

We could pass in the treesize as an argument to dbFindCtl() if we can't come up with something simpler.

Shaggy


Signed-off-by: Manas Ghandat <ghandatmanas@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: syzbot+aea1ad91e854d0a83e04@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=aea1ad91e854d0a83e04
---
  fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c
index a14a0f18a4c4..5af17b2287be 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c
@@ -2948,6 +2948,10 @@ static int dbFindLeaf(dmtree_t * tp, int l2nb, int *leafidx)
              /* sufficient free space found.  move to the next
               * level (or quit if this is the last level).
               */
+
+            if (x + n > TREESIZE)
+                return -ENOSPC;
+
              if (l2nb <= tp->dmt_stree[x + n])
                  break;
          }