Re: [RFC v1 4/4] nvmet-discovery: do not use invalid port

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 11:13:49AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The port entry binding might not be existing and thus the req->port
> pointer is not valid.
> 
> Reproducer: nvme/005 with active system nvmf-autoconnect systemd service.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/target/discovery.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/discovery.c b/drivers/nvme/target/discovery.c
> index 668d257fa986..fc113057cb95 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/target/discovery.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/discovery.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,15 @@ static void nvmet_execute_disc_get_log_page(struct nvmet_req *req)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +
> +	/* No port assigned, portentrybinding is missing */

Double new line above, and I think a missing white space before
binding.  But I'm still confused how we can get here without req->port
set.  Can you try to do a little more analysis as I suspect we have
a deeper problem somewhere.